On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Edgar Fuß wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.5.tar.gz
Does the ManageSieve patch for 1.2.4 work with 1.2.5?
Works for me - although I have reedited it to match perfectly to the
sources (but it doesn't make any actual difference).
Best regards,
--
Jacek
Hi,
I was trying to create complete rpm package for my system, containing
dovecot 1.2.5 intregrated with dovecot-sieve and dovecot-managesieve.
Finally I succeeded and it works great, but I found something that might
be treated as wrong behaviour...
When you run ./configure --with-docs=no,
well . here for me, with 'openssl s_client', i cant even connect
when using -ssl2:
[r...@correio ~]# openssl s_client -connect localhost:993 -ssl2
[ ... ]
27110:error:1406D0B8:SSL routines:GET_SERVER_HELLO:no cipher
list:s2_clnt.c:450:
[r...@correio ~]#
but that's probably
On Sep 29, 2009, at 6:33 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
with ssl3 and tls1 i can connect and see the zlib compression
being enabled.
Interesting.
- openssl s_client -ssl2 fails, because SSLv2 is disabled
- openssl s_client doesn't enable compression
- openssl s_client -tls1 or -ssl3
On Sep 29, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So I guess if client is using SSLv23_client_method() instead of
SSLv3_client_method() or TLSv1_client_method() it doesn't work. Also
Thunderbird uses Network Security Services library instead of
OpenSSL, so it might not support compression
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 14:31 +0100, S. A. Woltering wrote:
The problems we see are sporadic thunderbird error messages of the kind
cannot save message to Sent folder and for some users with large-ish
numbers of mail folders one
Hi Oliver,
is it possible to use the dovecot proxy feature for the mangaesieve
server also ?
Yes, it works.
Hi,
I can't get quota lda plugin working...
When I enable quota plugin, the emails (delivered by exim + dovecot-lda) are
instantly rejected:
2009-09-29 16:36:12 1MsdoI-aJ-2L ** ja...@my-domain.pl R=mysql_localuser
T=dovecot_delivery: Child process of dovecot_delivery transport (running
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:50 +0200, Jacek Osiecki wrote:
I can't get quota lda plugin working...
When I enable quota plugin, the emails (delivered by exim + dovecot-lda) are
instantly rejected:
Yeah, there is a bug in 1.2.5 if you're using non-Maildir++ quota. This
patch fixes it:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 21:49 +0100, Ed W wrote:
Timo normally chimes in pretty fast on these types of questions - Any
chance of a yay/nay on the COMPRESS option Timo?
Maybe. I'm kind of busy with other stuff though..
Understood
Please take it as a
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:50 +0200, Jacek Osiecki wrote:
I can't get quota lda plugin working...
When I enable quota plugin, the emails (delivered by exim + dovecot-lda) are
instantly rejected:
Yeah, there is a bug in 1.2.5 if you're using non-Maildir++ quota. This
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:50 -0400, Mario Antonio wrote:
Does 1.2.5 have problems with maildir quota and imap quota?
No.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 9/28/2009 12:41 PM, Edgar Fuß wrote:
There is a way to add 'alternate names'
Subject Altenative Names.
but I don't think TBird (or most other Clients) will recognize them.
The only client I know of NOT suporting subjectAltName is plain old pine.
Cool... thanks! I'll give it a try then
Robert Schetterer wrote:
no problem, but i think
getmail should place emails without running
external mta to in virtual users maildirs
there may be problems with permissions and home paths for virtuals users
but getmail setup should be enough flexi to manage this
perhaps you read again
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:50 +0200, Jacek Osiecki wrote:
I can't get quota lda plugin working...
When I enable quota plugin, the emails (delivered by exim + dovecot-lda) are
instantly rejected:
Yeah, there is a bug in 1.2.5 if you're using
I'm trying to clean up the code for Dovecot v2.0 and I just keep coming
back to the same thought: Is having the super-fast maildir -
single-dbox migration really actually a good idea?
Some problems with it:
1. Makes the code more complex.. And I've already fixed many bugs
related to that, maybe
16 matches
Mail list logo
