On Dec 27, 2014 3:19 AM, Marc Stürmer m...@marc-stuermer.de wrote:
You could use the message UID to delete those pesky messages maybe.
Of course you could try deleting those messages on your own and run
afterwards a doveadm index. This should also do the job.
As I said in my OP I could use
Hello,
I'm curious as to what happens if I were to manually delete files in
an sdbox on the server. A long time ago -- I'm not sure how, as it was
several years ago -- something happened and a number of users got a
large number of mail messages duplicated. Literally duplicated -- all
headers, all
On Dec 25, 2014 3:15 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 25.12.2014 um 21:09 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Robert Schetterer skrev den 2014-12-25 19:49:
Am 18.12.2014 um 17:56 schrieb Robin Helgelin:
We’re using dovecot 1.0.7
that version is total out of date , update to recent
Hello,
Is there a way to have a Sieve script create a non-existent folder
rather than have it deliver messages to INBOX instead?
I'm using Dovecot 2.0.8 with Postfix, via LMTP.
Thanks!
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Pascal Volk
user+dove...@localhost.localdomain.org wrote:
On 12/18/2010 03:33 PM Jeff Mitchell wrote:
Is there a way to have a Sieve script create a non-existent folder
rather than have it deliver messages to INBOX instead?
See RFC 5490 section 3.2 - :create
I'm running Dovecot 2.0.8.
The other day I tested doveadm expunge on a test Inbox with a few
messages received over the course of a day, and using savedbefore a
few hours, and it seemed to work.
However, today I was testing converting some maildirs over to sdbox,
and noticed odd behavior: it's
On Dec 17, 2010 7:20 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 17.12.2010, at 21.15, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
However, today I was testing converting some maildirs over to sdbox,
and noticed odd behavior: it's deleting all messages in the specified
folder instead of just the ones matching
Hello,
I'm currently on Dovecot 1.1.17 and I have a user that runs into a
problem quite a lot. She's using Thunderbird on a Mac.
When she sends mail, Thunderbird is set up to save sent mail to her
Sent folder. Often (usually when she has not sent another mail for a
long while) when she sends
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Stephan Boschstep...@rename-it.nl wrote:
Hello Dovecot users,
This release is entirely composed of bug fixes, most of which were found and
fixed earlier in the implementation for Dovecot v1.2.
Great!
Does anyone know if the actual sieve tarball for 1.1.16
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Stephan Boschstep...@rename-it.nl wrote:
What do you mean? The CMUSieve version used for Dovecot v1.1.x is
dovecot-sieve-1.1.6. This is a non-specific release that should (and does)
work fine with the new 1.1.17 Dovecot release.
This page on dovecot.org:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Stephan Boschstep...@rename-it.nl wrote:
This page on dovecot.org: http://dovecot.org/releases/sieve/ has
tarballs that track the various Dovecot releases. So you can
understand why I might wonder if the lack of a 1.1.17 means that
1.1.16 is okay :-)
Look
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com wrote:
Patch #5. Required by Apple's lawyers.
Patch 5 seems spurious to me, regardless of what Apple's lawyers want.
Three of the four patches are working around bugs in Apple's own OS.
Most are a few lines.
Sending
Jorge Salamero Sanz wrote:
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 00:13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I don't think so. I want to distribute it with Sieve plugin, and that
pretty much requires changes that come only in v2.0.
so what's the suggested setup for server-side mail filtering right now ?
If
13 matches
Mail list logo
