but I think it works like this ...
Best regards, Adrian.
Am 30.12.13 09:40 schrieb Philipp Kolmann:
Hi Adrian,
Am 26.12.2013 12:20, schrieb Adrian Zaugg:
You can use exim to prepare the address as you wish: only the user name
for pam users and the full address for virtual users.
Configure
------------
DI Mag. Philipp Kolmann mail: kolm...@zid.tuwien.ac.at
Technische Universitaet Wien web: www.zid.tuwien.ac.at
Zentraler Informatikdienst (ZID) tel: +43(1)58801-42011
Wiedner Hauptstr. 8-10, A-1040 Wien
Hi,
I have a mailsystem where i have some local users with shell access and
full home dirs which receive mail and also several SQL virtual users
only for mail.
With the virtual users, everything works fine. Mail is delivered via
LMTP and also sieve works :)
The SQL Lookup knows what to do wit
On 2010-06-30 16:26, 秋元 亮二 wrote:
> - Exim
> --
> dovecot_login:
>
> driver = dovecot
> public_name = LOGIN
> server_socket =
> /var/run/dovecot/auth-client
> server_set_id = $auth1
>
> dovecot_plain:
>
> driver = dovecot
> publ
Hi,
we use dovecot 1.1.11 on a RH Server with sendmail. Local delivery is
done with deliver:
Mlocal, P=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver,
F=lsDFMAw5:/|@qSPfhn9, S=EnvFromL/HdrFromL, R=EnvToL/HdrToL,
T=DNS/RFC822/X-Unix,
A=deliver -d $u
This setup work
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 8/11/2008, Mathieu Kretchner ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
So here is my next environment :
how many mailbox ?
5000
with adequate hardware/RAM, no problem
how many users ?
6000
again - with adequate hardware/RAM, no problem
Ok it seems
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/23/2008, Luca Corti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It fails on random files, since the system is running a few daemons
without any problem I'd go for the gcc bug.
Actually, failing at random point when compiling is *much* more likely
to be a memory error.
If the 'few
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 04:12:13PM -0400, Brandon Keepers wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2008, at 3:50 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
>
> >on 4-1-2008 12:34 PM Brandon Keepers spake the following:
> >>Upgrade. rc15 way over a year old. I think backports has newer
> >>version.
>
> That did it. Thanks
>
> Anoth
Philipp Kolmann wrote:
Ed W wrote:
> Anyone using either Glusterfs or DRBD in their mail setup? How is
> performance, manageability? Problems? Tips?
I have DRBD below IMAP and it works nice for 20 accounts.
A collegue has the student POP3/IMAP Server here with a 2.9 TB DRBD
sli
Ed W wrote:
> Anyone using either Glusterfs or DRBD in their mail setup? How is
> performance, manageability? Problems? Tips?
I have DRBD below IMAP and it works nice for 20 accounts.
A collegue has the student POP3/IMAP Server here with a 2.9 TB DRBD
slice and dovecot on it with no other se
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:21:20PM -0700, Patrick - South Valley Internet wrote:
> We just migrated away from our AIX machines which were running Postfix
> and UW-IMAP. We're now running Postfix with Dovecot. I already
> converted everyone's mbox file to maildir, but now I'm having a little
>
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 02:58:58PM +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Philipp Kolmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I wanted to enable FS quota support in dovecot, and have configured the
> >following directives:
> >
> >p
: 1.0.rc15
* Debian sid: 1.0.0
Thanks for any help in this issue.
Philipp Kolmann
--
If you have problems in Windows: REBOOT
If you have problems in Linux: BE ROOT
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:59:33PM -0400, John Gray wrote:
> Paul wrote:
> >Is there a plan to upgrade the stable package from 1.0-rc15?
> I believe I saw 1.0 in unstable. Shouldn't be a big deal to backport
> that to sarge.
Hasn't hit backports.org[1] so far. But I bet, you'll see it there soon
14 matches
Mail list logo