On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> Robert Wolf wrote on 13/09/2017 10:26:
>
> > are you sure? What is the refresh time? Instantly or with some delay? Have
> > you
> > tested what happens if I install new key, but I delay installing correct
> > certificate?
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Daniel Miller wrote:
> And remove that "postfix reload" command - Postfix doesn't require explicit
> reloading. It'll pickup the changed cert automagically.
>
> Daniel
Hoi Daniel,
are you sure? What is the refresh time? Instantly or with some delay? Have you
tested what
. Therefore they expect some real DB.
More feature == more requirements.
Regards,
Robert Wolf.
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Ivan Warren wrote:
> Le 8/22/2017 à 10:03 AM, Robert Wolf a écrit :
> >
> > WRONG!!! The email is stored plain-text on the first server and then it can
> > be
> > sent to other few MX servers over plain-text connection. I.e. encrypted
> > c
But he cannot misuse your login.
Regards,
Robert Wolf.
t they have to encrypt the email itself, if they want
protect it.
Regards,
Robert Wolf.
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> On 21/08/17 13:39, Robert Wolf wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote:
> > > > On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
&
rvices) can be configured to fail correct login, if the login
is made through plain-text channel. This is good, because MITM cannot
instantly see, if the password is correct or not, but the password goes
already plain-text and MITM can test it on secure connection later.
Regards,
Robert Wolf.
