On 09/15/11 11:43, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 11:37 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
So you have a proxy that decides what backend server the connections are
redirected to? How about you do it completely without locking with
dsync? Moving between servers works basically the same as conv
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 11:37 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
> > So you have a proxy that decides what backend server the connections are
> > redirected to? How about you do it completely without locking with
> > dsync? Moving between servers works basically the same as converting a
> > mailbox format, wi
On 09/15/11 10:39, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:25 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
What is the best way to do this? If there is no such thing currently,
would it be hard to implement the sticky bit checking on the root?
dovecot-uidlist.lock basically does this. Dovecot comes with mai
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:25 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
> >> What is the best way to do this? If there is no such thing currently,
> >> would it be hard to implement the sticky bit checking on the root?
> > dovecot-uidlist.lock basically does this. Dovecot comes with maildirlock
> > utility to proper
On 09/15/11 10:19, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 13:32 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for the alternative of qmail's chmod -t (sticky bit on the
maildir root) for Dovecot. What I'm trying to achieve with this lock:
- Dovecot lmtp should give back a temporary error (so
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 13:32 +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for the alternative of qmail's chmod -t (sticky bit on the
> maildir root) for Dovecot. What I'm trying to achieve with this lock:
> - Dovecot lmtp should give back a temporary error (so the email will be
> deferred a
Hello,
I'm looking for the alternative of qmail's chmod -t (sticky bit on the
maildir root) for Dovecot. What I'm trying to achieve with this lock:
- Dovecot lmtp should give back a temporary error (so the email will be
deferred and re-delivered later)
- all other Dovecot daemons (pop, imap) sh
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 10:14 +0400, Mike Grozak wrote:
> dovecot.log:deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): May 16 04:18:48 Info:
> msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: save failed to INBOX: Timeout
> while waiting for lock
You can't really do much about these on Dovecot's side, but you could
try reducing the max. numb
On 5/22/2008 7:06 AM, Mike Grozak wrote:
First of all, I want ti thank the whole Dovecot community (developers
for developing and fast responses, users for populating and responses
too). Dovecot is a really good and fast IMAP server - it serves near
3000 in our installation.
What filesystem i
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/22/2008, Mike Grozak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
First of all, I want ti thank the whole Dovecot community (developers
for developing and fast responses, users for populating and responses
too). Dovecot is a really good and fast IMAP server - it serves near
3000 in our
On 5/22/2008, Mike Grozak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
First of all, I want ti thank the whole Dovecot community (developers
for developing and fast responses, users for populating and responses
too). Dovecot is a really good and fast IMAP server - it serves near
3000 in our installation.
What
Hi all!
First of all, I want ti thank the whole Dovecot community (developers
for developing and fast responses, users for populating and responses
too). Dovecot is a really good and fast IMAP server - it serves near
3000 in our installation.
Now I have a problem and request community's help its
Hi all!
First of all, I want ti thank the whole Dovecot community (developers
for developing and fast responses, users for populating and responses
too). Dovecot is a really good and fast IMAP server - it serves near
3000 in our installation.
Now I have a problem and request community's help
13 matches
Mail list logo
