On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 20:00 -0700, Robin wrote:
> I'm writing a swiss-army (C-based, no bytecode crap languages) mailbox
> "transcoding" tool, since none appear to exist. To keep it simple, I/O
> to/from "remote" mailbox (connections) are not pipelined. It won't
> require more than MAXEMAILSI
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 09:24 +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> Why is it a problem that dsync takes a long time, when it can be done
> without downtime for the users?
>
> I just started our maildir->mdbox convertion yesterday, using the
> attached script. I only converted a little over 1 eas
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Jeff Gustafson wrote:
> I looked around the 'Net to see if there might be a custom program for
> offline Maildir to mdbox conversion. So far I haven't turned up
> anything. The problem for us is that the dsync program simply takes a
> lot of time to convert
On 3/27/2012 3:40 PM, Jeff Gustafson wrote:
I looked around the 'Net to see if there might be a custom program for
offline Maildir to mdbox conversion. So far I haven't turned up
anything. The problem for us is that the dsync program simply takes a
lot of time to convert mailboxes.
Is i
I looked around the 'Net to see if there might be a custom program for
offline Maildir to mdbox conversion. So far I haven't turned up
anything. The problem for us is that the dsync program simply takes a
lot of time to convert mailboxes. I wonder if time could be saved with a
program that
