Re: [Dovecot] Solr 4.0 - lucene - FTS

2013-01-19 Thread Paul Freeman
On 2012-11-07 15:14, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 7.11.2012, at 15.01, Charles Marcus wrote: As one who is interested in implementing FTS sometime in the future, I'm curious about what is in store as far as improvements go... Specifically, any plans for implementing immediate/automatic index

Re: [Dovecot] Solr 4.0 - lucene - FTS

2012-11-11 Thread Daniel L. Miller
On 2012-11-08 03:45, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-11-07 10:14 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: No, fts-lucene and fts-solr are separate backends. But I do have some small plans to add a few more features to fts-solr. Thanks again Timo, but one last follow-up... According to the

Re: [Dovecot] Solr 4.0 - lucene - FTS

2012-11-08 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-11-07 10:14 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: No, fts-lucene and fts-solr are separate backends. But I do have some small plans to add a few more features to fts-solr. Thanks again Timo, but one last follow-up... According to the wiki, Solr is the preferred method, but that seems

[Dovecot] Solr 4.0 - lucene - FTS

2012-11-07 Thread Charles Marcus
Hi Timo, As one who is interested in implementing FTS sometime in the future, I'm curious about what is in store as far as improvements go... Specifically, any plans for implementing immediate/automatic index updates at delivery time? The lack of automatically updated indexes is one

Re: [Dovecot] Solr 4.0 - lucene - FTS

2012-11-07 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 7.11.2012, at 15.01, Charles Marcus wrote: As one who is interested in implementing FTS sometime in the future, I'm curious about what is in store as far as improvements go... Specifically, any plans for implementing immediate/automatic index updates at delivery time? The lack of

Re: [Dovecot] Solr 4.0 - lucene - FTS

2012-11-07 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-11-07 10:14 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: Specifically, any plans for implementing immediate/automatic index updates at delivery time? The lack of automatically updated indexes is one downside for its implementation... Nothing really prevents from adding that very easily .. I

Re: [Dovecot] Solr 4.0 - lucene - FTS

2012-11-07 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 7.11.2012, at 18.21, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-11-07 10:14 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: Specifically, any plans for implementing immediate/automatic index updates at delivery time? The lack of automatically updated indexes is one downside for its implementation... Nothing

Re: [Dovecot] Solr 4.0 - lucene - FTS

2012-11-07 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-11-07 11:29 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On 7.11.2012, at 18.21, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-11-07 10:14 AM, Timo Sirainent...@iki.fi wrote: Specifically, any plans for implementing immediate/automatic index updates at delivery time? The lack of automatically updated