On 15.8.2012, at 22.23, Jeff Gustafson wrote:
>> dsync-local(tss): Fatal: dsync backup: Looks like you're trying to run
>> backup in wrong direction. Source is empty and destination is not.
>
> That's the one!
>
>> Maybe it needs a force setting, or change the detection somehow..
>
>
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 12:27 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 15.8.2012, at 5.41, Jeff Gustafson wrote:
>
> > I have an issue related to this problem. dsync returns an error 75 when
> > it detects the source mailbox is empty (client probably pop3'd all of
> > their email). It also returns an er
On 15.8.2012, at 5.41, Jeff Gustafson wrote:
> I have an issue related to this problem. dsync returns an error 75 when
> it detects the source mailbox is empty (client probably pop3'd all of
> their email). It also returns an error 75 when I get the timeout error.
You mean this?
dsync-loca
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 23:23 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 11.8.2012, at 0.54, Jeff Gustafson wrote:
> > What can I do to help the developers locate the bug?
>
> Those hangs are a little bit annoying to debug, and the whole code has
> been rewritten for v2.2 already in a way that should mak
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 23:23 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 11.8.2012, at 0.54, Jeff Gustafson wrote:
>
> > More dsync issues. We were running 2.1.7 and we updated to 2.1.9. Same
> > problem with both versions.
> > I'm getting an error 75 on about 40 boxes out of 1800. It is the same
> >
On 11.8.2012, at 0.54, Jeff Gustafson wrote:
> More dsync issues. We were running 2.1.7 and we updated to 2.1.9. Same
> problem with both versions.
> I'm getting an error 75 on about 40 boxes out of 1800. It is the same
> list of boxes every time we use 'dsync backup' to backup the se
I ran a rsync on the mailboxes that I was having issues with. I re-ran
rsync until I had a full sync with no further updates. Then I ran a
dsync. dsync was able to run without issue.
If I wipe out the target directory and re-run dsync, I'm back to dsync
getting stuck. Running rsync
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 15:50 +0200, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> Maybe you have run into the epoll kernel bug under RHEL/CentOS:
>
:) Yeah... been there, done that. We found that bug within *minutes* of
ksplice updating the kernel. I don't think this is an epoll thing
because, if it was, custo
Jeff Gustafson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 00:56 +0200, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> > Hi Jeff,
> > Please start by following the instructions at
> > http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html
> > and post your 'doveconf -n' output in order to provide
> > possibly important information about your system and c
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 00:56 +0200, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> Please start by following the instructions at
> http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html
> and post your 'doveconf -n' output in order to provide
> possibly important information about your system and configs.
Storage is local hardware
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Gustafson wrote:
> More dsync issues. We were running 2.1.7 and we updated to 2.1.9. Same
> problem with both versions.
> I'm getting an error 75 on about 40 boxes out of 1800. It is the same
> list of boxes every time we use 'dsync backup' to backup the server.
> dsync
More dsync issues. We were running 2.1.7 and we updated to 2.1.9. Same
problem with both versions.
I'm getting an error 75 on about 40 boxes out of 1800. It is the same
list of boxes every time we use 'dsync backup' to backup the server.
dsync seems to stop communicating to the bac
12 matches
Mail list logo