On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:10:00PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 16:39 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> > And in fact your tests (below) reproduced this. The problem with this is
> > that if even one file or directory within the user's IMAP folder space is
> > currently unava
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 16:39 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> And in fact your tests (below) reproduced this. The problem with this is
> that if even one file or directory within the user's IMAP folder space is
> currently unavailable (due to an NFS server being down), the user cannot
> log in at a
Did I miss a reply on this? We're considering modifying Dovecot, but
would like opinions before going down the wrong path...
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:39:25PM -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:28:20AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 20:03 -0500, [E
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:28:20AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 20:03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi folks. Quick question in the hopes that someone knows the answer, before
> > I dig in the code some more.
> >
> > In testing a new setup with some long-term archival
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 20:03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi folks. Quick question in the hopes that someone knows the answer, before
> I dig in the code some more.
>
> In testing a new setup with some long-term archival mbox-format mailboxes
> stored on an NFS mount, we've found the followi
Hi folks. Quick question in the hopes that someone knows the answer, before
I dig in the code some more.
In testing a new setup with some long-term archival mbox-format mailboxes
stored on an NFS mount, we've found the following: if the mount is
unavailable for any reason, the user cannot log
