Am 27.02.2015 um 15:42 schrieb Andreas Kasenides:
I am contemplating changing my maildir setup to mdbox but I still need
to make a case for it
against maildir which has become a de-facto standard and provides sort
of a secure basis in case of
software changes.
Pros of Mdbox:
* uses less
27.02.2015 18:14, Paolo Cravero пишет:
mdbox is THE reason why I am trying Dovecot. With mailboxes of several (tens
of) GB with several k of messages I hope mdbox will speedup backups.
What backup method are you using?
I am doing one-way synchronization to mdbox+SIS at separate ZFS
27.02.2015 17:42, Andreas Kasenides пишет:
I am interested in finding out your experiences with using the dbox format
(especially mdbox) if you use this format.
I am using mdbox+SIS on small production server about 2 months. It works well
for me. But I have had some difficulties using
I am interested in finding out your experiences with using the dbox
format (especially mdbox) if you use this format.
I am contemplating changing my maildir setup to mdbox but I still need
to make a case for it
against maildir which has become a de-facto standard and provides sort
of a secure
Andreas,
I am interested in finding out your experiences with using the dbox
format (especially mdbox) if you use this format.
mdbox is THE reason why I am trying Dovecot. With mailboxes of several (tens
of) GB with several k of messages I hope mdbox will speedup backups. Also
SIS for
