:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/e2a9f741/attachment-0001.html>
2013/10/23 Sean Paul :
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>> 2013/10/23 Sean Paul :
>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> 2013/10/23 St?phan
ssignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/b61e2aaa/attachment.html>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> From: Marek Ol??k
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Ol??k
Applied. thanks!
Alex
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cikd.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cikd.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/
ttp://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/7a84cc37/attachment.html>
...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/ce04886a/attachment.html>
scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/53c4579e/attachment.html>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:48:51PM +0200, Denis Carikli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/18/2013 09:46 AM, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> >> +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_PDATEN (1<<22)
> >> +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_NDATEN (1<<23)
> >> +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_PPIXDATEDGE (1<<
nee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/62183533/attachment.html>
|--- |FIXED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/ce211af8/attachment.html>
g/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/e31ac2dc/attachment.html>
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Mota Leite
wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 21:09:31 -0400, Alex Deucher
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Daniel Mota Leite
>> wrote:
>> > [ 12.359671] == power state 1 ==
>> > [ 12.359726] ui class: performance
>> > [ 12.359824] internal
t was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/344bc7d9/attachment.html>
>
I think we need to start considering a framework where subdrivers just
add drm objects themselves, then the toplevel node is responsible for
knowing that everything for the current configuration is loaded.
>>>
>>> It would be nice to specify the various pieces in dt,
Hi,
On 10/18/2013 09:46 AM, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
>> +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_PDATEN(1<<22)
>> +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_NDATEN(1<<23)
>> +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_PPIXDATEDGE (1<<24)
>> +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_NPIXDATEDGE (1<<25)
>
> Do we
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> As I mentioned earlier, display_ops is needed to have no any
>>> dependency of drm framework directly like below,
>>>
>>> DRM Framework
>>>
We use u16 for voltage values throughout the driver so switch
the table values to a u16 as well. Fixes an incompatible
cast error in ci_patch_clock_voltage_limits_with_vddc_leakage()
picked up by coverity.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed,
> As I mentioned earlier, display_ops is needed to have no any
> dependency of drm framework directly like below,
>
> DRM Framework
>|
> Exynos DRM Framework
>
2013/10/23 Sean Paul :
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>> 2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Inki Dae
> w
2013/10/22 Inki Dae :
> 2013/10/17 Sean Paul :
>> This patch splits display and manager from subdrv. The result is that
>> crtc functions can directly call into manager callbacks and encoder
>> functions can directly call into display callbacks. This will allow
>> us to remove the exynos_drm_hdmi s
2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> 2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7
The driver uses {readl,writel}_relaxed(), which are not available on all
platforms, so restrict the driver to ARM for now. Fixes a build failure
seen on x86_64 allmodconfig.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
drivers/gpu/drm/armada/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
di
HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/4cde8778/attachment-0001.html>
2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> 2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 2013/10/22 Sean Paul :
>> >> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Inki Dae
>> >> > wrote:
2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> 2013/10/22 Sean Paul :
>> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> -Original Message-
>> >>> From: Sean Paul [mailto:seanpaul at chromium.org]
>> >>> Sent: Tuesday,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>
> I think we need to start considering a framework where subdrivers just
> add drm objects themselves, then the toplevel node is responsible for
> knowing that everything for the current configuration is loaded.
>
>>
2013/10/22 Sean Paul :
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Sean Paul [mailto:seanpaul at chromium.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:18 AM
>>> To: Inki Dae
>>> Cc: dri-devel; Dave Airlie; Tomasz Figa; St?phane Marchesin
>>> Subj
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> As I mentioned earlier, display_ops is needed to have no any
> depend
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, display_ops is needed to have no any
dependency of drm framework directly like below,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, display_ops is needed to have no any
dependency of drm framework directly like below,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> Look at omapdrm, nouveau, and radeon drm drivers.
btw, please don't look at omapdrm as a "good" example in this regard.
The layering is really not a good idea and for a long time caused a
lot of problems, which we essentially solved by bypassing
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Denis Carikli wrote:
> Without that fix, drivers using the drm_display_mode_from_videomode
> function will not be able to get certain information because
> some DISPLAY_FLAGS_* have no corresponding DRM_MODE_FLAG_*.
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Cc: driverdev-
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> As I mentioned earlier, display_ops is needed to have no any
>> dependency of drm framework directly like below,
>>
>> DRM Framework
>>|
>>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> 2013/10/23 Sean Paul :
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>> 2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>
> 2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
> >
> >
receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/cf2529e7/attachment-0001.html>
scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/ed8fb01e/attachment-0001.html>
|--- |FIXED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20131023/1a94ec4a/attachment.html>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> 2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>>
>>> 2013/10/23 St?phane Marchesin :
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> 2013/10/23 St?phane Marc
38 matches
Mail list logo
