https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
Elizabeth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
Daniel Vetter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
Daniel Vetter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #93 from Cool Loki ---
Created attachment 69804
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69804&action=edit
dmesg.txt
dmseg.txt
kernel 3.7.0-rc4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #92 from Cool Loki ---
Created attachment 69803
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69803&action=edit
lspci -v
My laptop model: Fujitsu Siemens FMV-610NU2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #91 from Cool Loki ---
Created attachment 69802
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69802&action=edit
intel_drm_dumper
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next pa
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #90 from Cool Loki ---
Created attachment 69801
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69801&action=edit
rom_loki.bin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
Cool Loki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #93 from Cool Loki ---
Created attachment 69804
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69804&action=edit
dmesg.txt
dmseg.txt
kernel 3.7.0-rc4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #92 from Cool Loki ---
Created attachment 69803
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69803&action=edit
lspci -v
My laptop model: Fujitsu Siemens FMV-610NU2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #91 from Cool Loki ---
Created attachment 69802
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69802&action=edit
intel_drm_dumper
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #90 from Cool Loki ---
Created attachment 69801
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69801&action=edit
rom_loki.bin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
Cool Loki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||florian at mickler.org
--- Comment #88
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||flor...@mickler.org
--- Comment #88 fr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #87 from Daniel Vetter 2012-06-27 02:08:17 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #86)
> Now two weeks passed, I submitted five versions for a patch of this bug to the
> mailing list, one here in public, yet nothing shows up in the official gi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #86 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-27 00:17:50 PDT ---
Now two weeks passed, I submitted five versions for a patch of this bug to the
mailing list, one here in public, yet nothing shows up in the official git
repository at all.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #87 from Daniel Vetter 2012-06-27 02:08:17 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #86)
> Now two weeks passed, I submitted five versions for a patch of this bug to the
> mailing list, one here in public, yet nothing shows up in the official git
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #86 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-27 00:17:50 PDT ---
Now two weeks passed, I submitted five versions for a patch of this bug to the
mailing list, one here in public, yet nothing shows up in the official git
repository at all.
I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
thor at math.tu-berlin.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
t...@math.tu-berlin.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #84 from Daniel Vetter 2012-06-07 00:32:02 PDT
---
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:21 AM, wrote:
> (Is actually anyone reading this??? Is there a better way to supply patches?)
Well, if you have a patch that works somewhat attaching it t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #83 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-06 18:21:06 PDT ---
Finally, success!
I'm not quite sure why, but for reasons unclear to me the DVO chip only wants
to talk if the PLL is enabled and running and the screen resolution fits. I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #84 from Daniel Vetter 2012-06-07 00:32:02 PDT ---
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:21 AM, wrote:
> (Is actually anyone reading this??? Is there a better way to supply patches?)
Well, if you have a patch that works somewhat attaching it to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #83 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-06 18:21:06 PDT ---
Finally, success!
I'm not quite sure why, but for reasons unclear to me the DVO chip only wants
to talk if the PLL is enabled and running and the screen resolution fits. In
a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #82 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-03 10:35:15 PDT ---
Got a step further. What one can do to get a stable picture is simply to
disable the scaler.
For this, insert: in dvo_ns2501.c, in the function
static void ns2501_mode_se
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #82 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-03 10:35:15 PDT ---
Got a step further. What one can do to get a stable picture is simply to
disable the scaler.
For this, insert: in dvo_ns2501.c, in the function
static void ns2501_mode_set
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #81 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-01 06:10:32 UTC ---
Well, I've got a bit futher:
1) One can get i2c access mostly reliable when the drm.debug option is set
high. Thus, whether or not the i2c interface works is likely a matter
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #81 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-01 06:10:32 UTC ---
Well, I've got a bit futher:
1) One can get i2c access mostly reliable when the drm.debug option is set
high. Thus, whether or not the i2c interface works is likely a matt
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #80 from Gilles Dartiguelongue
2012-05-29 15:14:55 PDT ---
Actually, last I read this datasheet, it said that we could obtain the
programming guide from our local NS vendor. I think that's what we are missing
to have a functional dri
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #79 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:29:24 PDT ---
But as the drm module is never loaded, the corresponding i2c devices are not
exposed? Can I trigger this process manually without loading the drm module?
The idea was to ch
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:13 PM, wrote:
> --- Comment #75 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT ---
> Well, I do have a documentation from National Semiconductors, but there is
> nothing that would define frequencies or bandwidths - only the sync pulses can
> be set, and intput t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #78 from Daniel Vetter 2012-05-29 14:13:48 PDT
---
> --- Comment #77 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:05:28 PDT ---
> Sorry if this sounds like a stupid question - but how come that i2cdetect only
> sees one bus when boot
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #77 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:05:28 PDT ---
Sorry if this sounds like a stupid question - but how come that i2cdetect only
sees one bus when booting with the vga frame buffer, but 7 with the i915drm
module in place?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #76 from Daniel Vetter 2012-05-29 12:20:12 PDT
---
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:13 PM, wrote:
> --- Comment #75 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT ---
> Well, I do have a documentation from National Semiconductors,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #75 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT ---
Well, I do have a documentation from National Semiconductors, but there is
nothing that would define frequencies or bandwidths - only the sync pulses can
be set, and intput
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #80 from Gilles Dartiguelongue
2012-05-29 15:14:55 PDT ---
Actually, last I read this datasheet, it said that we could obtain the
programming guide from our local NS vendor. I think that's what we are missing
to have a functional dri
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #79 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:29:24 PDT ---
But as the drm module is never loaded, the corresponding i2c devices are not
exposed? Can I trigger this process manually without loading the drm module?
The idea was to check
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #78 from Daniel Vetter 2012-05-29 14:13:48 PDT ---
> --- Comment #77 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:05:28 PDT ---
> Sorry if this sounds like a stupid question - but how come that i2cdetect only
> sees one bus when booting
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #77 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:05:28 PDT ---
Sorry if this sounds like a stupid question - but how come that i2cdetect only
sees one bus when booting with the vga frame buffer, but 7 with the i915drm
module in place? Is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #76 from Daniel Vetter 2012-05-29 12:20:12 PDT ---
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:13 PM, wrote:
> --- Comment #75 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT ---
> Well, I do have a documentation from National Semiconductors, but
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:13 PM, wrote:
> --- Comment #75 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT ---
> Well, I do have a documentation from National Semiconductors, but there is
> nothing that would define frequencies or bandwidths - only the sync pulses can
> be set, and intput to s
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #75 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT ---
Well, I do have a documentation from National Semiconductors, but there is
nothing that would define frequencies or bandwidths - only the sync pulses can
be set, and intput to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #74 from Daniel Vetter 2012-05-29 00:36:03 PDT
---
> I played with i2cset here and there and could disable and enable the screen
> with register #8, bit #0, but I do not get a usable screen. I do not know
> enough about DVO chips to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #73 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-28 23:59:16 PDT ---
Ok, so I now fiddled a little bit with the patched kernel and the i2c
utilities. In fact, I do get "something like a picture" on this machine. By
which I mean that the imag
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #74 from Daniel Vetter 2012-05-29 00:36:03 PDT ---
> I played with i2cset here and there and could disable and enable the screen
> with register #8, bit #0, but I do not get a usable screen. I do not know
> enough about DVO chips to b
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #73 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-28 23:59:16 PDT ---
Ok, so I now fiddled a little bit with the patched kernel and the i2c
utilities. In fact, I do get "something like a picture" on this machine. By
which I mean that the image i
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #72 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-25 14:51:23 PDT ---
Ok, I managed to cross-compile the patched kernel sources on a much faster x64
machine, so I now have an initrd and a vmlinuz with the patch in it. I won't
have access to t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #72 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-25 14:51:23 PDT ---
Ok, I managed to cross-compile the patched kernel sources on a much faster x64
machine, so I now have an initrd and a vmlinuz with the patch in it. I won't
have access to the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
Daniel Vetter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[830M] need support for |[830M missing dvo driver]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
Daniel Vetter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[830M] need support for |[830M missing dvo driver]
51 matches
Mail list logo
