On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 05:23:29PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> A address-only I2C_WRITE can't be replied with a short i2c ack, but I
> suppose it could be replied with an i2c defer. So the code should be
> prepared for an address-only
From: Ville Syrjälä
A address-only I2C_WRITE can't be replied with a short i2c ack, but I
suppose it could be replied with an i2c defer. So the code should be
prepared for an address-only I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE.
Cc: Thierry Reding
Cc: "Terje Bergström"