On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:12 PM, wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
> Although last time around people leaned towards the __uX types, if we
>> have a consensus amongst drm (kernel) developers about using stdint
>> ones everything should be fine.
>> We just need a handful of
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 04:05:21PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 22 August 2016 at 15:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>> That said, _note_ that some applications are built with -C89 -pedantic
> >>> [1] which means that using stdint.h may or
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> That said, _note_ that some applications are built with -C89 -pedantic
>> [1] which means that using stdint.h may or may not work as expected.
>> So we'll want a __STDC_VESION__ check + #error in case of pre-C99 ?
>> If the affected programs
On 22 August 2016 at 15:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> That said, _note_ that some applications are built with -C89 -pedantic
>>> [1] which means that using stdint.h may or may not work as expected.
>>> So we'll want a __STDC_VESION__ check +
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Although last time around people leaned towards the __uX types, if we
> have a consensus amongst drm (kernel) developers about using stdint
> ones everything should be fine.
> We just need a handful of acks from the different maintainers.
>
My
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:48:10AM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 20 August 2016 at 23:31, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Mikko Rapeli
> > wrote:
> >> Cc'ing lkml too.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:54:21PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >>> Story time:
> >>> I was
Am 22.08.2016 um 10:48 schrieb Emil Velikov:
>
> Although last time around people leaned towards the __uX types, if we
> have a consensus amongst drm (kernel) developers about using stdint
> ones everything should be fine.
> We just need a handful of acks from the different maintainers.
For the
On 20 August 2016 at 23:31, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>> Cc'ing lkml too.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:54:21PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Story time:
>>> I was dreaming of a day were we can stop installing these headers,
>>> thus making
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 20 August 2016 at 23:31, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>>> Cc'ing lkml too.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:54:21PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
Story time:
I was dreaming of a day
