Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] backlight: as3711_bl: fix device-tree node leaks

2017-11-29 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Johan Hovold wrote: > Two framebuffer device-node names were looked up during probe, but were > only used as flags to indicate the presence of two framebuffer device. > > Drop the unused framebuffer name along with a likewise unused device > pointer from the driver data, and

[PATCH v2 4/4] backlight: as3711_bl: fix device-tree node leaks

2017-11-21 Thread Johan Hovold
Two framebuffer device-node names were looked up during probe, but were only used as flags to indicate the presence of two framebuffer device. Drop the unused framebuffer name along with a likewise unused device pointer from the driver data, and update the platform data to pass in booleans instead

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] backlight: as3711_bl: fix device-tree node leaks

2017-11-20 Thread Daniel Thompson
On 20/11/17 10:45, Johan Hovold wrote: Two framebuffer device-node names were looked up during probe, but were only used as flags to indicate the presence of two framebuffer device. Drop the unused framebuffer name along with a likewise unused device pointer from the driver data, and update the