On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 17:43, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > Absolutely, otherwise it's a bug. FWIW, the DRM from DRI CVS seems to
> > work the same here as the one from the linuxppc-2.5 tree shortly before
> > the -test5 merge. The only recent change I see
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> Absolutely, otherwise it's a bug. FWIW, the DRM from DRI CVS seems to
> work the same here as the one from the linuxppc-2.5 tree shortly before
> the -test5 merge. The only recent change I see which might cause
> problems is my Radeon AGP => GART clean
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to find out where the register gets overwritten. I don't see
> any code doing it, and I've never experienced this problem.
Are you SMP? I have hyperthreading turned on. I'll try it again with SMP turned
off.
=
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jon Smirl wrote:
I think I have tracked this down to the DRM drivers in the kernel not matching
the ones in DRI CVS. Some of the structures in the initialization IOCTL have
changed which caused one of the ring pointers to initialize to zero instead of
wha
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 23:30, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> This line in radeon_cp is causing the problem with the ring pointers.
> dev_priv->agp_vm_start = RADEON_READ( RADEON_CONFIG_APER_SIZE );
> agp_vm_start is coming out zero and I don't think it should be.
Indeed, as the name suggests, it's e
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I can do a new merge [ ... ]
Is the "dri.freedesktop.org" tree up-to-date? Nothing has happened on it
lately, and I wonder if people are still using the old one for
development?
In the meantime, I could add you to the sf developer
--- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Fault in radeon DRM module
> To: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I haven't located the exact ca
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 01:17, Jon Smirl wrote:
> In this case I loaded the radeon kernel driver from CVS. I am running XFree
> from RH9. No code from embedded is involved. This is with i875P AGP.
>
> I first started X and it ran without problem.
> I stopped it and started it again.
> I get an oops
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 22:11, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >
> > I think I have tracked this down to the DRM drivers in the kernel not matching
> > the ones in DRI CVS. Some of the structures in the initialization IOCTL have
> > changed which caused one of the ring
In this case I loaded the radeon kernel driver from CVS. I am running XFree
from RH9. No code from embedded is involved. This is with i875P AGP.
I first started X and it ran without problem.
I stopped it and started it again.
I get an oops in radeon_do_cp_start()
It may be that embedded and Xfre
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 13:12, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > I can do a new merge [ ... ]
>
> Is the "dri.freedesktop.org" tree up-to-date? Nothing has happened on it
> lately, and I wonder if people are still using the old one for
> development?
It is
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> I can do a new merge [ ... ]
Is the "dri.freedesktop.org" tree up-to-date? Nothing has happened on it
lately, and I wonder if people are still using the old one for
development?
Linus
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> I think I have tracked this down to the DRM drivers in the kernel not matching
> the ones in DRI CVS. Some of the structures in the initialization IOCTL have
> changed which caused one of the ring pointers to initialize to zero instead of
> what it needed.
Jon Smirl wrote:
I think I have tracked this down to the DRM drivers in the kernel not matching
the ones in DRI CVS. Some of the structures in the initialization IOCTL have
changed which caused one of the ring pointers to initialize to zero instead of
what it needed. The minor version number prob
I think I have tracked this down to the DRM drivers in the kernel not matching
the ones in DRI CVS. Some of the structures in the initialization IOCTL have
changed which caused one of the ring pointers to initialize to zero instead of
what it needed. The minor version number probably should have
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> I'm getting this with standalone Mesa not DRI. Can a someone more familar with
> the R200 kernel DRM driver give me a clue as to what is not being set up
> correctly? I die in RADEON_PURGE_CACHE() in radeon_do_cp_start().
More precisely:
> Unable to handl
I'm getting this with standalone Mesa not DRI. Can a someone more familar with
the R200 kernel DRM driver give me a clue as to what is not being set up
correctly? I die in RADEON_PURGE_CACHE() in radeon_do_cp_start().
There also looks to be a bug. After the fault there is a radeon_vm_shm_close.
Th
17 matches
Mail list logo
