Re: Two module_param problems with Linux 2.6.4

2004-10-29 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2004 16:38 schrieb Jon Smirl: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:54:21 +0200, Dieter Nützel > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2004 12:42 schrieb Felix Kühling: > > > Two small problems I had with Linux 2.6.4: > > > > > > 1. In order to make drm_stub.c

Re: Two module_param problems with Linux 2.6.4

2004-10-29 Thread Jon Smirl
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:54:21 +0200, Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2004 12:42 schrieb Felix Kühling: > > Two small problems I had with Linux 2.6.4: > > > > 1. In order to make drm_stub.c compile without errors I had to > > #include explicitly. >

Re: Two module_param problems with Linux 2.6.4

2004-10-28 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2004 12:42 schrieb Felix Kühling: > Two small problems I had with Linux 2.6.4: > > 1. In order to make drm_stub.c compile without errors I had to > #include explicitly. You mean: --- linux-core/drm_stub.c 2004-10-28 17:44:45.192753118 +0200 +++ linux

Two module_param problems with Linux 2.6.4

2004-10-28 Thread Felix Kühling
Two small problems I had with Linux 2.6.4: 1. In order to make drm_stub.c compile without errors I had to #include explicitly. 2. drm_compat.h defines an empty "module_param" if it's undefined. It should do the same for "module_param_named". Regards, Felix -- | Feli