Re: [Dspace-tech] Clustering of Dspace servers

2007-09-19 Thread James Rutherford
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:26:52AM +0530, Nandita Chaudhri wrote: I was told Dspace does not respond well to software clustering of servers but is OK with hardware clustering. That depends on what you mean by software clustering. If we want a high availabilty application in Dspace what is

Re: [Dspace-tech] Clustering of Dspace servers

2007-09-19 Thread Graham Triggs
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 11:51 +0200, Christian Voelker wrote: So in case Sequoia and Terracotta turn out not to be the way to go, then Slony deserves a second look. But I agree that all this doesnt sound to be a job for an afternoon. NB: Terracotta is not part of a solution for replicating the

[Dspace-tech] Clustering of Dspace servers

2007-09-18 Thread Nandita Chaudhri
I was told Dspace does not respond well to software clustering of servers but is OK with hardware clustering. If we want a high availabilty application in Dspace what is the recommended configuration for the servers and software if any required. Regards,