Mike Tremaine wrote:
> I personally you like to add an extra please for the dev rpms. I think
> having them makes it much easier for the community to get involved in
> helping. The 2.0 release with all the rpms was much much easier to test
> and make new updates or new packages for then the 2.1
OK the folks that I need to build this for do not have their own smtp server
they are using all pop3 access. I can I tell if the SPAM filters are
working and how long does it take to train. 2 more, i tried using my gmail
account (imap) to use for a training source but it was unable to connect.
Mike Tremaine wrote:
> I personally you like
s/you/would/
:/ typo's happen
-Mike
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configu
Peter Warasin wrote:
> Hi Nico
>
> Nico Prenzel wrote:
>> would you be so kind to publish the devel rpm's of 2.2 Beta 1?
>
> Working on it.. Creating the devel rpm's is always ways more work than
> creating the iso. Therefore's always delayed.
>
>
>
I personally you like to add an extra please
I used ntop to view graphs about my work net. Suddenly ntop doesnt work
anymore.
The message send by the browser is that the it can charge the page
X:3001
Can someone help me?
Thank you very much
Alain Hermosilla Ringger
Chile
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/
I often have troubles installing an SMP version of some distros. I get kernel
panics after the install, on the first boot.
If that does happen, you can just install in uni-processor mode. It wastes the
power of one of the cpus, but should run fine otherwise...
-Original Message-
From:
compdoc wrote:
> Should work, though unless you have a lot of users, dual cpus might be more
> trouble than it's worth.
>
> I can't speak to efw, because I haven't tried it, but some distros are more
> difficult to set up on dual cpu/core systems.
>
> Just need to try it...
>
>
Should not hav
> Hi Nico
>
> Nico Prenzel wrote:
> > would you be so kind to publish the devel rpm's of 2.2 Beta 1?
>
> Working on it.. Creating the devel rpm's is always ways more work than
> creating the iso. Therefore's always delayed.
Okay, nice. Didn't want to bait.
> What xen-features do you miss with t
I've just been trying out 2.2 Beta 1 and it still does not recognise the on-
board Intel NIC on a nuber of HP and Dell PCs. I get 00:19.0 Ethernet
controller: Intel Corporation: Unknown device 10c0 (rev 02). Apparently this
is fixed in the latest e1000 driver. Is there any possibibility of updati
Should work, though unless you have a lot of users, dual cpus might be more
trouble than it's worth.
I can't speak to efw, because I haven't tried it, but some distros are more
difficult to set up on dual cpu/core systems.
Just need to try it...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi Nico
Nico Prenzel wrote:
> would you be so kind to publish the devel rpm's of 2.2 Beta 1?
Working on it.. Creating the devel rpm's is always ways more work than
creating the iso. Therefore's always delayed.
> Do you plan to stick at kernel release 2.6.9.* for the 2.2 release?
I tried the up
I'm sure it's a bit overkill but the latest person I'm
trying to introduce to EFW is wanting to use a DELL
POWEREDGE 1650 DUAL 1.26GHZ 1GB 80GB HDD with an
additional 80GB HDD for mirroring.
http://cgi.ebay.com/DELL-POWEREDGE-1650-DUAL-1-26GHZ-1GB-80GB-HDD_W0QQitemZ200166999794QQihZ010QQcategoryZ
So basically, "manual load balancing" now, and rules-based/automatic (sessions,
IPs, traffic, round-robin, etc.) later? And really, I'm talking about outbound
load-balancing, though inbound would be a great feature too.
Do I then assume that failover from RED interface to RED interface _is_
cu
compdoc wrote:
> Port forwarding to different internal IPs would be one benefit
Exactly. You can use your main uplink for your normal traffic from green
and another dedicated uplink for your DMZ, or for a specific or some
server/services within your DMZ.
peter
--
:: e n d i a n
:: open source -
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Peter,
> Are you saying a single red (one) interface can pull two ip's from the
> aggregator at someones ISP?
> jlc
Yes. If you have an ip pool assigned from your ISP, or more different IP
pools, you can configure it now.
That's what usually is done if you STATICally co
Hello Endian Team,
would you be so kind to publish the devel rpm's of 2.2 Beta 1?
Do you plan to stick at kernel release 2.6.9.* for the 2.2 release?
Especially for the xen environment this would be only suboptimal.
Thanks for your really nice product.
Greeting.
NicoP.
Raphael Vallazz
Port forwarding to different internal IPs would be one benefit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AJ Weber
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 8:43 AM
To: Peter Warasin; efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Efw-user] Endian Firewall 2.2 Beta 1 released
What bene
What benefit do you get from multiple WAN links up simultaneously, if there's
no load-balancing capability?
Thanks for all the effort, and taking the time to respond
-AJ
- Original Message -
From: Peter Warasin
To: AJ Weber ; efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, Oc
Peter,
Are you saying a single red (one) interface can pull two ip's from the
aggregator at someones ISP?
jlc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Warasin
Sent: October-29-07 7:54 AM
To: AJ Weber; efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: R
Thanks for the information and taken time to respond.
On 10/29/07, Peter Warasin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi
>
> Tom Bishop wrote:
> > Was wondering when dans guardian 2.9 would be included, i thought I read
> > that it was in the works but was wondering on what sort of time frame.
> > Thank
hi AJ
AJ Weber wrote:
> What does this bullet mean?
> * Multiple IPs/networks on each WAN/RED interface in STATIC mode
You can assign multiple ip addresses, also from different networks to a
WAN/RED interface. But only if that uplink is in static mode. This was
before known as "Aliases", but befo
What does this bullet mean?
* Multiple IPs/networks on each WAN/RED interface in STATIC mode
Do you mean you can only support different ISPs/IPs on multiple RED interfaces
in STATIC mode?
Or are you saying something different (like you could use one RED NIC and
assign it multiple static IPs an
Hi,
there are no proxy diagrams.
I see "Lines Analyzed: 6748 lines (6748 errors)".
Hartmut
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and
hi
Tom Bishop wrote:
> Was wondering when dans guardian 2.9 would be included, i thought I read
> that it was in the works but was wondering on what sort of time frame.
> Thanks.
Dansguardian 2.9 is still considered BETA.
We will probably not include it until it becomes stable. You probably
read
24 matches
Mail list logo