Off Topic but with so much expertise flying around I thought I would ask how
mechanical filters compare with crystal filters.
I think they were fairly low in frequency (455kHz?), so, not suitable in the
present discussion, but it would be good for our education at least.
David
G3UNA
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Cutter
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 1:43 PM
> To: Elecraft
> Subject: [Elecraft] OT mechanical v crystal filters OT
>
> Off Topic but with so much expertise flying around I thought
> I would ask how mech
> Off Topic but with so much expertise flying around I thought I would ask how
> mechanical filters compare with crystal filters.
>
> I think they were fairly low in frequency (455kHz?), so, not suitable in the
> present discussion, but it would be good for our education at least.
>
> David
>
John,
Please describe the quadrature phasing part of your receiver.
On weak signals, I often find narrower filter settings of the K2
make the signal harder to copy.
Part of that might be my bad hearing and the higher pitch
sidetone I like...
The noise and the signal seem to blend into one pitch..
Hi Brett.
> John,
> Please describe the quadrature phasing part of your receiver.
In general terms, the design is very similar to quadrature phasing receivers
used for SSB operation, except that since the bandwidth in this case is very
narrow, the 90 degree audio phase shifting network becomes r
5 matches
Mail list logo