Hello James,
I am Thomas from Germany. Sorry if my English is a bit strange. I am
also a member of the Votorola-Project. I like very much, that you are
doing theoretical work on this subject. As far as I'm aware, this is
quite needed.
In your paper you write about the one benefit of delegate
On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:25 PM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
This is some thought about keeping it simple, yet doable.
I will lean toward Ranked Pairs with margins,
not sure what "with margins" does. i'll read below...
but amending toward other types of Condorcet should be doable.
Voting: Voter can
Thanks - there are so many Condorcet methods that I chose to describe
what I see as a better one, while giving up on getting understood via
naming.
On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:50 PM, Markus Schulze wrote:
Hallo,
Dave Ketchum (7 April 2010):
For RP I see deleting the smallest margins from
the li
Hallo,
Dave Ketchum (7 April 2010):
> For RP I see deleting the smallest margins from
> the list until what remains is not a cycle, but
> does identify a winner.
"Deleting the smallest margins from the list until
what remains is not a cycle" rather sounds like the
Schulze method.
Markus Schulze
This is some thought about keeping it simple, yet doable.
I will lean toward Ranked Pairs with margins, but amending toward
other types of Condorcet should be doable.
Voting: Voter can rank one or more candidates. Equal ranking
permitted. Counters care only which of any pair of candidate
