Done, thanks.
I am using -no-site-file instead of --no-site-file, this seems to
works best
with different Emacsen..
- Carsten
On May 4, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
David Bremner writes:
is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
emacs -Q for byte-compil
[D'oh: I replied to Carsten only - sorry about that.]
--- Forwarded Message
Date:Sun, 03 May 2009 16:27:15 -0400
From:Nick Dokos
To: Carsten Dominik
cc: nicholas.do...@hp.com
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Make
file
David Bremner writes:
>> > is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
>> > emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
>>
>> this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I am not
>> even sure about Emacs 22.
>
> at least for Emacs 22, it works. XEmacs apparently
On May 4, 2009, at 2:17 PM, David Bremner wrote:
At Sun, 3 May 2009 21:52:05 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
emacs
-Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
this is a good idea, but -Q is
At Sun, 3 May 2009 21:52:05 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> > is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
> > emacs
> > -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
>
> this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I
> am n
On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Hi all,
is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
emacs
-Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
Hi Tassilo,
this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I
am not even sure about Emacs 22.
- Carsten
I use
Hi all,
is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not emacs
-Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
I use a lot of elisp addons, so loading the site-lisp files takes quite
some time and some packages like CEDET even print messages while loading
and obfuscate the compile output. I ch
