forwarded to the list (because I mistakenly sent it first only to
Carsten).
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:25:27 -0400
From: John Rakestraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] an annoying indentation
Hi Carsten
On 6/15/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I did notice that extra bit in your proposal. However,
I think it will easily lead to unwanted behavior as well:
** heading
- item 1
- item 2
- item 3
will get you:
** heading
- item 1
- item 2
On Jun 15, 2007, at 15:44, William Henney wrote:
Note that this will also imply that a list like
- item 1
- item 2
- item 2a
- item 2b
- item 3
would be flattened by TAB presses going from top to bottom.
Not according to my understanding, since items 2a and 2b would fall
under the "un
On 6/15/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, at 17:02, pete phillips wrote:
>> "John" == John Rakestraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John> In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If
On 6/15/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow, what a turnout, and unanimous too.
I join the majority :)
Note that this will also imply that a list like
- item 1
- item 2
- item 2a
- item 2b
- item 3
would be flattened by TAB presses going from top to bottom.
Yes, but
On Jun 14, 2007, at 17:43, Rick Moynihan wrote:
pete phillips wrote:
"John" == John Rakestraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If
user
>> want to move the item deep
On Jun 14, 2007, at 17:02, pete phillips wrote:
"John" == John Rakestraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
want to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
Jo
On 6/14/07, Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pete phillips wrote:
>> "John" == John Rakestraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John> In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
> >> want to move
pete phillips wrote:
"John" == John Rakestraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
>> want to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
>>
John> I agr
> "John" == John Rakestraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
>> want to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
>>
John> I agree with Leo -- or,
On 6/14/07, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Carsten Dominik (2007-06-14) wrote:-
> *** headline
> - item 1
> - item 2
> here we have some text
> - item 3
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user want
to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be
> - Carsten Dominik (2007-06-14) wrote:-
>
> > *** headline
> > - item 1
> > - item 2
> > here we have some text
> > - item 3
In response to which, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user want
> to move the it
- Carsten Dominik (2007-06-14) wrote:-
> *** headline
> - item 1
> - item 2
> here we have some text
> - item 3
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user want
to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
--
Leo (GPG
On Jun 12, 2007, at 19:36, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
I hit this a bit, but I'm pretty quick with C-S-_. Likewise I use
M-return and M-S-return pretty religiously now. My problem is that
M-right will insert spaces into the following line when it is blank.
I keep having to clear the following line
On Jun 12, 2007, at 19:18, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Leo wrote:
Dear list,
Anyone else find the following annoying?
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Best,
I must admit I do run into this on occasion and
On 6/12/07, Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leo wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Anyone else find the following annoying?
>
> *** heading 1
> - item 1
> - item 2
>
> Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
>
> *** heading 1
> - item 1
> - item 2
>
> Best,
I must admit I do
Leo wrote:
Dear list,
Anyone else find the following annoying?
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Best,
I must admit I do run into this on occasion and it is a little annoying.
It would (IMHO) be
On 6/12/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The question I have is: why would you press TAB if not to indent?
Well, in most major modes TAB means "fix the indentation of this
line", rather than "do some more indentation here" (the only exception
I can think of is "shell-script-mode")
On Jun 12, 2007, at 17:13, Leo wrote:
Dear list,
Anyone else find the following annoying?
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
The question I have is: why would you press TAB if not to indent?
- Car
Hi Leo
On 6/12/07, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone else find the following annoying?
Yes, but...
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
... I reported this to the list last week and Carsten po
Dear list,
Anyone else find the following annoying?
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Best,
--
Leo (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)
___
Emacs
21 matches
Mail list logo
