Samuel Wales writes:
> i would say that respecting narrowing is expected in emacs, as a kind
> of pseudo-buffer bob/eob, so it would be surprising to find that it
> might not be so in a part of org. lack of it should be mentioned, but
> might be a bug.
I think the main confusion was about activ
[i realized there is a footnote to my comment about narrowing. of
course there might be questions about what org will do if there are
things that refer to outside the region, like links or macro
definitions.]
On 5/26/22, Samuel Wales wrote:
> i would say that respecting narrowing is expected in
i would say that respecting narrowing is expected in emacs, as a kind
of pseudo-buffer bob/eob, so it would be surprising to find that it
might not be so in a part of org. lack of it should be mentioned, but
might be a bug.
On 5/25/22, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>
>>> Could you
>>> "IR" == Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>>> Could you please clarify which part of the function docstring was not
>>> clear?
>>
>> Well
>> | org-export-dispatch is an interactive compiled Lisp function in
>> | ‘ox.el’.
>> |
>> | (org-export-dispatch &optional ARG)
>> ...
>>
>>
Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Could you please clarify which part of the function docstring was not
>> clear?
>
> Well
> | org-export-dispatch is an interactive compiled Lisp function in
> | ‘ox.el’.
> |
> | (org-export-dispatch &optional ARG)
> ...
>
> Does not mention, that a selected region gets expo
>>> "IR" == Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> It seems that I did not check this carefully enough. Indeed, if I mark a
>> region and run the export function, only the active region will be
>> exported. The docstring of that function is, however, not that clear
>> about it.
> Could
Uwe Brauer writes:
> It seems that I did not check this carefully enough. Indeed, if I mark a
> region and run the export function, only the active region will be
> exported. The docstring of that function is, however, not that clear
> about it.
Could you please clarify which part of the functio
>>> "WD" == William Denton writes:
> On 25 May 2022, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> Sometimes I only want to convert/export a region or a paragraph of an
>> org file to another format, most likely as html or latex.
> Is this different from subtree export? After C-c C-e, C-s will toggle
> "export scope" b
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:09 AM Uwe Brauer wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Sometimes I only want to convert/export a region or a paragraph of an
> org file to another format, most likely as html or latex.
> I cannot find such a functionality also not in the package system
> does anybody knows about such a func
On Wednesday, 25 May 2022 at 16:35, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Sometimes I only want to convert/export a region or a paragraph of an
> org file to another format, most likely as html or latex.
> I cannot find such a functionality also not in the package system
> does anybody knows about such a function?
On 25 May 2022, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Sometimes I only want to convert/export a region or a paragraph of an
org file to another format, most likely as html or latex.
Is this different from subtree export? After C-c C-e, C-s will toggle "export
scope" between buffer and subtree. (There's also C-
11 matches
Mail list logo