Re: STP vs FTP Ethernet cables (2)

2001-09-05 Thread Doug McKean
Paolo Roncone wrote: > > The reason of my inquiry is that we bought samples of "STP" and "FTP" > cat.5 cables for 10bT ethernet applications from different vendors and to > our surprise we discovered that both "STP" and "FTP" types have an > overall (external) shield made of aluminum foil, but no

Power Amplifier for 2 GHz Immunity

2001-09-05 Thread UMBDENSTOCK
Hello Forum, I was wondering what amplifier you are using for the 2 GHz testing requirement of EN61000-4-3? Any comments regarding "if I had to do it over again, I would have . . . " relative to your 2 GHz setup? Best regards, Don Umbdenstock Sensormatic ---

RE: Military Equipment and the EU

2001-09-05 Thread Allen, John
Hi Folks We have been into this subject in some detail as we supply a lot of equipment into this market. The situation varies enormously between Directives - there is certainly not a common approach in the New Approach Directives. Our current reading of the situation is LVD - No exemptions in

Re: Military Equipment and the EU

2001-09-05 Thread Nick Williams
The situation for 'military equipment' is complex. Certain directives have specific exclusions for military equipment, although I am told that not every member state has actually included such provisions in their national legislation in every case. There is also a blanket exclusion under the

Re: Military Equimpment and the EU

2001-09-05 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Stewart, Judd wrote (in <408ae30013d2d3118d3700508b3102a3e0f...@nt.littondsd.com>) about 'Military Equimpment and the EU', on Tue, 4 Sep 2001: >I am faced with coming up with a regulatory strategy for equipment that >will be sold to a foreign military (member of the EU).

Re: Military Equimpment and the EU

2001-09-05 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that wo...@sensormatic.com wrote (in <846BF526A205F8 4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A43A272@flbocexu05>) about 'Military Equimpment and the EU', on Tue, 4 Sep 2001: >I forgot one - the Battery Directive applies to all batteries. Anti-aircraft batteries? (;-) -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO

Re: Military Equimpment and the EU

2001-09-05 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that wo...@sensormatic.com wrote (in <846BF526A205F8 4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A43A270@flbocexu05>) about 'Military Equimpment and the EU', on Tue, 4 Sep 2001: >The RTTE Directive would apply if the equipment intentionally transmits or >receives using the rf spectrum or if the equipment

FET probe caution

2001-09-05 Thread Douglas C. Smith
Hi All, Did you know that a common accessory for FET probes can, in some cases, cause a significant error in the measurement? My September Technical Tidbit at: http://www.dsmith.org describes the problem. The accessory in question is a probe tip with a small ground "spring" or "pin" on a hinge