We are looking to hire a full-time compliance engineer for our Livermore
operation, which focuses on 3-phase solar and wind power products from
30kW into the low megawatts. The position deals mostly with product
safety and utility interconnection compliance, with any EMC or other
product regulator
In message
<3c6137471f17424280d9b2ceaefd7f853b6...@usmafrexmb01.bose.com>, dated
Mon, 23 Jun 2008, "Tyra, John" writes:
>While not mandatory the ENEC Mark can be useful on components as some
>Agencies will accept this Mark as showing compliance to the applicable
>component standards. I have
While not mandatory the ENEC Mark can be useful on components as some Agencies
will accept this Mark as showing compliance to the applicable component
standards. I have found this useful when getting a CB report for a product
which incorporates an ENEC Marked safety critical component.
That's my feeling - it's an illogical exclusion. At most the standard
should disallow the use of any (ie technology neutral) device that has
not been tested to a relevant standard that takes cycle life into
account, but to pick on auto-reset electromechanical devices while
allowing auto-reset soli
4 matches
Mail list logo