On 10 January 2012 19:07, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> I much prefer d-sub connectors. They're inexpensive, the ear screws are
> a positive closer, strain relief is robust,
Also 7A per pin and 250V rated.
I have mentioned them before, but PowerCON and Speakon connectors are
very solid and high quality
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 05:30:32 PM Przemek Klosowski did opine:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> > A bit like 'scart' connectors. Many of the commodity connectors are
> > designed for
> > single use only, plug it in and leave it alone. I've seen some quote
> > '10 in
2012/1/10 Kirk Wallace :
> On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 12:56 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>>
>> Speaking of connectors, has anyone considered using RJ-45?
>
> I much prefer d-sub connectors.
Agreed for whole 100%!
Actually this type is the only I have ever used in machines to make
different signal wi
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 12:56 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> >
> > A bit like 'scart' connectors. Many of the commodity connectors are
> > designed for
> > single use only, plug it in and leave it alone. I've seen some quote '10
> > insert
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>
> Speaking of connectors, has anyone considered using RJ-45? it's a proven
> locking connector that's cheap and rated for over 1A per pin, and the
> cables are easy to custom-assemble. What's not to like, I'm asking in all
> seriousness?
>
Well, these connectors are RE
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> A bit like 'scart' connectors. Many of the commodity connectors are
> designed for
> single use only, plug it in and leave it alone. I've seen some quote '10
> insertions max'! It would be nice to have a good quality lockable connector
> st
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>> It seems like more and more LCD screens have HDMI input ports will
>> > that be the future video standard?
>> >
>> > The DVI connector seems like an overkill compared to the HDMI connector.
>
> True that, DVI is much bigger and yet less functional because HDMI al
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Dave wrote:
> It seems like more and more LCD screens have HDMI input ports will
> that be the future video standard?
>
> The DVI connector seems like an overkill compared to the HDMI connector.
True that, DVI is much bigger and yet less functional because
On 1/7/2012 6:47 PM, Ben Jackson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 11:37:17PM +, andy pugh wrote:
>
>> HDMI to DVI-D should be easy then, and I would much rather drive an
>> LCD with DVI than pretend it has a raster and send VGA.
>>
> Yes, if you want DVI-D (for LCD) then HDMI is just
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 11:37:17PM +, andy pugh wrote:
>
> HDMI to DVI-D should be easy then, and I would much rather drive an
> LCD with DVI than pretend it has a raster and send VGA.
Yes, if you want DVI-D (for LCD) then HDMI is just a cabling issue.
The video signals are the same.
(HDMI c
On 7 January 2012 23:30, Ben Jackson wrote:
> N. DVI has pins in it (the 4 more widely spaced ones in a square
> on one end) which carry VGA. Most (maybe all) display cards present
> normal analog VGA signals on those pins. There are devices ("DVI-D")
> which don't have those pins and are
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:20:45AM +1100, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
> I've just googled for HDMI to VGA converter cables, and they seem cheap and
> plentiful.
>
> Is this just a plug in solution? Is the HDMI signal VGA compatible?
N. DVI has pins in it (the 4 more widely spaced ones in a squa
12 matches
Mail list logo
