On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 10:53:06AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote :
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Albin Tonnerre
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 08:43:01AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote :
> >> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Albin Tonnerre
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, May
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 08:43:01AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote :
>> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Albin Tonnerre
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 01:18:38PM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote :
>
>
>> >> On Fri, 1 May 2009, Gustav
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 08:43:01AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote :
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Albin Tonnerre
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 01:18:38PM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote :
> >> On Fri, 1 May 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:13
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb:
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 1 May 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:02:45 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbi
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 01:18:38PM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote :
>
>
>> On Fri, 1 May 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> > wrote:
>> > The only problem I see and I already talked
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 01:18:38PM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote :
> On Fri, 1 May 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> > wrote:
> > The only problem I see and I already talked to Albin about it is on
> > weird compilers without offsetof()
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 1 May 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:02:45 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>>> said:
>>>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:11 AM,
On Fri, 1 May 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:02:45 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> said:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Albin Tonnerre
>>> wrote:
Hello,
While playing with
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:02:45 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Albin Tonnerre
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > While playing with Eina_Inlist, I noticed that given a pointer to an
>> > Eina_Inli
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 10:13:09AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:02:45 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Albin Tonnerre
> > wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > While playing with Eina_Inlist, I noticed that given a pointer to an
> > >
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:02:45 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Albin Tonnerre
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > While playing with Eina_Inlist, I noticed that given a pointer to an
> > Eina_Inlist, one can't easily get a pointer to the structure containing it.
>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Albin Tonnerre
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While playing with Eina_Inlist, I noticed that given a pointer to an
> Eina_Inlist, one can't easily get a pointer to the structure containing it.
> The only option now is to put the Eina_Inlist first in the structure, and
> then
Hello,
While playing with Eina_Inlist, I noticed that given a pointer to an
Eina_Inlist, one can't easily get a pointer to the structure containing it.
The only option now is to put the Eina_Inlist first in the structure, and
then cast this structure to an Eina_Inlist, which is far from optimal.
I
13 matches
Mail list logo