On Sunday, 28 May 2006, at 19:46:28 (+0100),
Andrew Williams wrote:
> should the ewl .spec not cover this? Am I missing something
> important?
No, you are correct. I've made the appropriate change to the spec
file.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PRO
should the ewl .spec not cover this? Am I missing something important?
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 14:31 -0400, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 May 2006, at 17:47:28 (+0100),
> Andrew Williams wrote:
>
> > emotion? engage should not depend on emotion, surely?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cvs/caos/g
On Sunday, 28 May 2006, at 17:47:28 (+0100),
Andrew Williams wrote:
> emotion? engage should not depend on emotion, surely?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cvs/caos/groups/e/engage >> rpm -qR engage | grep emotion
libemotion.so.0
I believe EWL pulls in emotion. But it's definitely linking against
it.
Mi
emotion? engage should not depend on emotion, surely?
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 01:36 -0400, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : mej
> Project : misc
> Module : engage
>
> Dir : misc/engage
>
>
> Modified Files:
> engage.spec
>
>
> Log Message:
> Sun