Hi all,
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:17:10AM +0200, ADA wrote:
It looks like, I've screwed up something, so my Terminology git was not
up to date. I've cloned it again to get a clean state, now it compiles fine.
By the way, the only file with problems was app_server.c. I've just
tracked the
On 14-05-11 09:32, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
it should build with 1.10 - what did you change? why didn't it build?
app_server. I was fed up with making that thing compatible with
different efl versions. On git, this part is only compiled with efl ≥
1.10. If people care about that part of the
On Tue, 13 May 2014 21:18:03 +0200 tc...@suse.cz said:
Hi all,
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:17:10AM +0200, ADA wrote:
It looks like, I've screwed up something, so my Terminology git was not
up to date. I've cloned it again to get a clean state, now it compiles fine.
By the way, the
It looks like, I've screwed up something, so my Terminology git was not
up to date. I've cloned it again to get a clean state, now it compiles fine.
By the way, the only file with problems was app_server.c. I've just
tracked the changes in EFL to make it compile. So:
-
On Thu, 08 May 2014 19:11:40 +0200 ADA ada...@gmail.com said:
Hi,
I've been playing around with the upcoming EFL/Elementary v1.10.0 beta
1 and e19 release and it seems to be promising. It's definitely faster
than the current stable version (probably due to the compositing
rewrite)
Hi,
I've been playing around with the upcoming EFL/Elementary v1.10.0 beta
1 and e19 release and it seems to be promising. It's definitely faster
than the current stable version (probably due to the compositing
rewrite) on my machine. :-)
Unfortunately, Terminology doesn't compile with
On 08/05/2014 19:11, ADA wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing around with the upcoming EFL/Elementary v1.10.0 beta
1 and e19 release and it seems to be promising. It's definitely faster
than the current stable version (probably due to the compositing
rewrite) on my machine. :-)