Hello,
I would like to ask what will happen to FrameworkConsole after the
Commind Line Interface is placed in a separate service (according to RFC
147)? Will FrameworkConsole remain in the framework or not? We are
currently using the console remotely (via telnet), and it is not very
user-friendly
Hi Michael,
Questions like yours are typically answered on the Equinox Newsgroup.
Please have a look there. I'll post a response to the newsgroup. This
list is intended for development discussions of the various Equinox
pieces themselves.
Web-Access:
http://www.eclipse.org/newsportal/thread.php?g
The map file has been updated for the following Bug changes:
+ Bug 262906. [http.registry]initializeDelegate in
ServletManager.ServletWrapper should be synchronized (FIXED)
+ Bug 263066. [server] Possible ClassCastException with wantClientAuth
(FIXED)
+ Bug 264701. [launcher] Launcher looks for sh
I am trying to create a Jetty Fragment which includes the jetty.xml file
to configure Jetty within my OSGi container. I can include the fragment
and it get's resolved but the changes implemented in the jetty.xml file
are not taking affect. What should the fragment host be for the Jetty
fragment.
The OSGi Alliance is hosting the OSGi Community Event September 22-23 in
Redwood City, CA. A call for papers is now out, so if you are interested in
presenting details can be found at
http://www.osgi.org/CommunityEvent2009/HomePage.
Deadline for submissions is May 15, 2009.
Ian Skerrett
The map file has been updated for the following Bug changes:
+ Bug 272599. [ds] Add support for new modified attribute on component
element (FIXED)
The following projects have changed:
org.eclipse.equinox.ds
Tom
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev
My guess is that you policy file is not getting read by the VM for some
reason. Try using an absolute path the the policy file.
Also note that your policy file is not used to manage the permissions of
the individual bundles installed into the framework. Bundle class loaders
use protection domain
Hi again,
It is true, I changed the extension in my policy file and I do not already
need to change anything in the common JVM policy file.
Thanks for your replies
-Mensaje original-
De: equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org]
En nombre de Mark Hoffmann
Hi,
I run equinox with my own policy, that looks like this:
grant codeBase
"file:/path_to_launcher_bundle/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.100.v20080509-1800.jar"
{
permission java.util.PropertyPermission "*", "read, write";
permission java.io.FilePermission "<>", "read, write, delete";
I got a solution for my problem, if I modify the common policy file in JVM
directory, instead of changing in my policy file (into my program
directory), and there I write:
grant {
permission java.security.AllPermission;
};
then If I launch Equinox with security parameters I do not get any excep
10 matches
Mail list logo