On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, Marius Gundersen wrote:
> >
> > One way to do this would be to predeclare the modules, as in:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> All of these scripts would need to be empedded in every page
Only the ones that are needed. But actually it's not that bad. Th
> One way to do this would be to predeclare the modules, as in:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
All of these scripts would need to be empedded in every page, which would
significantly increase the size of a document and the complexity in
creating a document. Not everyone is making a Single P
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, John Barton wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean here. The list returned from "instantiate"
> > is treated the exact same way as the list auto-discovered from
> > "import" statements when "instantiate" returns undefined: it's passed
> > to ProcessLoadDependencies(), whi
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, John Barton wrote:
> ... more misunderstanding about bundles skipped...
>
Let's give upon discussing bundles and pursue your dependency list scheme.
>
>
> > > I don't think it should be particularly complex. It only req
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, John Barton wrote:
>
> I think your graph is upside down from mine ;-) As I learned it, leaf
> nodes were the ones at the ends of branches and hence were not dependent
> on any other nodes; no node depended on a root node.
I don't really mind which way we view the graph. To
Not sure if my real world use case would be super helpful here, but just in
case, here it is. The app I work on is a very large single page app - over
150,000 lines of JS across more than 2000 files. Uncompressed, unminified,
and concatenated together, it weighs in at close to 10MB. We've been usin
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:54 AM, John Barton wrote:
> > Where? The Load Request records imply a dependency graph. Are these
> > maintained though out the life of the page? I don't see any existing
> > reason to expect these are maintained.
>
> Ian
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:54 AM, John Barton wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:37 AM, C. Scott Ananian
> wrote:
> Where? The Load Request records imply a dependency graph. Are these
> maintained though out the life of the page? I don't see any existing reason
> to expect these are maintained.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:37 AM, C. Scott Ananian
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:00 AM, John Barton
> wrote:
> >> Finally,
> >> it would be ideal if we could also adjust those dependencies on the
> >> fly, since if we're reflecting dependencies described in the mutable
> >> DOM structure, i
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:00 AM, John Barton wrote:
>> Finally,
>> it would be ideal if we could also adjust those dependencies on the
>> fly, since if we're reflecting dependencies described in the mutable
>> DOM structure, it might be mutated.
>
> I think this one is technically difficult.
I d
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:06 PM, John Barton
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >>
> >> This just doens't work.
> >>
> >> Suppose the dependency graph looks like this:
> >>
> >> Feature A --> Dependency
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:06 PM, John Barton wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>
>> This just doens't work.
>>
>> Suppose the dependency graph looks like this:
>>
>> Feature A --> Dependency A1 \__\ Dependency\
>> Feature B --> Dependency B1 / /AB
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
>
> > That's why in my opinion 'bundles' or 'packages' make sense: they
> > combine the related dependencies and allow them to be loaded in one
> > trip.
> >...
>
> This just doens't work.
>
> Suppose the dependency graph looks like this
13 matches
Mail list logo
