At 23:35 03/06/03 +1000, Colin Hales wrote:
Dear Folks,
Once again I find myself fossicking at the boundaries and need to ask
one of those questions. My first experience with an asker of such a
question was in the last couple of years at high school. I'll tell
you about it because, well, the list
Colin Hales wrote:
The real question is the ontological status of the 'nothing' in that
last sentence. I am starting to believe that the true nature of the
'fundamental' beneath qualia is not only about the 'stuff', but is
actually about all of it. That is, the 'stuff' and the 'not stuff'.
So. Any
My physics is decades-old first-year U level (I'm a computer science type).
But if I'm not mistaken, there's no such thing as a 2C speed, or a 2C
closing
of separation between two objects. All speeds can only be measured
from some reference frame that is travelling with one of the objects
(say A
On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 03:17 PM, Colin Hales wrote:
Re the latter thought:
Can I suggest reading a pile of Daniel Dennett? The
'representationalist' or its extremum: the "eliminativist" end of
consciousness is, as are all other philosophical positions as far as I
can tell, both right and wr
Hi,
> From: Mirai Shounen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think your idea makes sense.
> Just like the distance between two particles is not 'nothing'
> but a real
> property of the universe at that time (therefore there are 3 things
in
> mary's brain), also the specific configuration of
> neurotr
I think your idea makes sense.
Just like the distance between two particles is not 'nothing' but a real
property of the universe at that time (therefore there are 3 things in
mary's brain), also the specific configuration of neurotransmitters and
electrical impulses in the brain is something not le
6 matches
Mail list logo