Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"

2010-05-21 Thread Brent Meeker
On 5/21/2010 5:58 PM, m.a. wrote: - Original Message - *From:* Quentin Anciaux *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com *Sent:* Friday, May 21, 2010 9:19 AM *Subject:* Re: Quantum Immortality cons

Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"

2010-05-21 Thread m.a.
- Original Message - From: Quentin Anciaux To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 9:19 AM Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out" 2010/5/21 m.a. - Original Message - From: Stathis Papaioannou To:

Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"

2010-05-21 Thread Nick Prince
2010/5/21 m.a. > > > - Original Message - > *From:* Stathis Papaioannou > *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com > *Sent:* Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:35 PM > *Subject:* Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out" > > > > Why in the first case you call it "infinite" and in the oth

Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"

2010-05-21 Thread Quentin Anciaux
2010/5/21 m.a. > > > - Original Message - > *From:* Stathis Papaioannou > *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com > *Sent:* Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:35 PM > *Subject:* Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out" > > > > > On 20/05/2010, at 4:12 PM, "m.a." wrote: > > I may have th

Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"

2010-05-21 Thread m.a.
- Original Message - From: Stathis Papaioannou To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:35 PM Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out" On 20/05/2010, at 4:12 PM, "m.a." wrote: I may have this all wrong, but it seems t