6/13/2017 4:11 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
The reason why it would follow is precisely the point of my rhetorical
question above. If you take the wave function seriously, then you take
seriously that qubits really do exist in a superposition of states,
and this explains the exponential increase in
You seem to be taking the older view of many worlds that is favoured by
David Deutsch. This approach has serious problems with the notorious
basis problem, and there does not seem to be any principled way from
within the theory to select unambiguosly the basis in which all of these
worlds form.
On 11 Jun 2017, at 19:07, David Nyman wrote:
On 11 Jun 2017 16:44, "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 11 Jun 2017, at 12:24, David Nyman wrote:
On 11 June 2017 at 10:14, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Jun 2017, at 20:21, David Nyman wrote:
On 9 June 2017 at 12:34, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 Jun
On 13/06/2017 9:11 pm, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Bruce Kellett
wrote:
On 11/06/2017 1:31 am, Telmo Menezes wrote:
I think you built a straw man and now you're attacking it. When I
heard Deutsch make the argument, he was referring explicitly to Shor's
algorithm. This
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Bruce Kellett
wrote:
>>
>> I agree Interference must take place in a single world, but where did
>> all the information that produced the interference come from, where did the
>> computations that produced all those wrong answers (and a few correct ones)
>> co
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Bruce Kellett
wrote:
> On 11/06/2017 1:31 am, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Bruce Kellett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/06/2017 2:36 am, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Bruce Kellett
> The idea that
6 matches
Mail list logo