On 29/07/2010 13:32, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> The question of what distros should ship would be better posed to the
> GNOME release team, although from what they've said publicly so far I
> don't think even they have a clear picture. Fedora 14 is moving full
> steam ahead with a GTK+ 3.0 based desk
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 01:23 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I wonder if Matthew or Milan or anyone have any thoughts on what the
> delay in Gnome 3.0 means for Evolution.
>
> Is the current git master buildable and usable without Gnome 3.0
> components? Do you expect distros to build and ship both Gno
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 01:23 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I wonder if Matthew or Milan or anyone have any thoughts on what the
> delay in Gnome 3.0 means for Evolution.
Hi,
it means couple things, all positive. More work can be done, more
testing can be done, less time pressure.
> Is the cu
I wonder if Matthew or Milan or anyone have any thoughts on what the
delay in Gnome 3.0 means for Evolution.
Is the current git master buildable and usable without Gnome 3.0
components? Do you expect distros to build and ship both Gnome 2.x and
3.0 versions, to make transitions simpler?
