Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-25 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 13:40 -0500, Japhering wrote: > Just out of curiosity, is the lack of that package something the > build should have detected ? Hi, that's a question for flatpak-builder, or better for your distribution, to update the package dependencies. The flatpak-builder itself d

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-25 Thread Japhering via evolution-list
On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 09:57 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 11:33 -0500, Japhering via evolution-list > wrote: > > > > Paste bin of the log:   https://pastebin.com/UhxrbWS3 > Hi, > the end of the log says it all: > >    Warning: eu-elfcompress not install

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-25 Thread Japhering via evolution-list
On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 09:57 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 11:33 -0500, Japhering via evolution-list > wrote: > > > > Paste bin of the log:   https://pastebin.com/UhxrbWS3 > Hi, > the end of the log says it all: > >    Warning: eu-elfcompress not install

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-25 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 11:33 -0500, Japhering via evolution-list wrote: > Paste bin of the log: https://pastebin.com/UhxrbWS3 Hi, the end of the log says it all: Warning: eu-elfcompress not installed, will not compress debuginfo stripping /home/mhm/flatpak/org.gnome.Evolution-stab

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-22 Thread Japhering via evolution-list
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 08:38 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 19:14 -0500, Japhering wrote: > > > > Evolution in Flatpak spews errors when building and doesn't run. > Hi, > what are the errors, please? Where did you get the build script of > Evolution for Flatpak? > Below are

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-05 Thread Pete Biggs
> Well, blame Evolution and the mailing list. Someone, right after my > first reply, stated that all replies should be in plain text and > responses being interspersed with in the message. > > Unless, I'm missing an option in Evolution, I'm simply replying, > interspersing my responses with Ev

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-04 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 19:14 -0500, Japhering wrote: > Evolution in Flatpak spews errors when building and doesn't run. Hi, what are the errors, please? Where did you get the build script of Evolution for Flatpak? > Unless, I'm missing an option in Evolution, I'm simply replying,... This

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-04 Thread Japhering
> On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 09:34 -0500, Japhering wrote: > >  > > >  > > > ...The current default version on LinuxMint vs 18.3 ... > > > ... > > Unfortunately, that is all that is available without having to > > build > > from scratch, at least until someone fixes the issue with the > > flatpak. >

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-04 Thread Milan Crha
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 09:34 -0500, Japhering wrote: > > ...The current default version on LinuxMint vs 18.3 ... > > ... > Unfortunately, that is all that is available without having to build > from scratch, at least until someone fixes the issue with the > flatpak. Hi, out of curiosity, wh

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-03 Thread Jan Claeys
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 08:01 -0500, Michael H Moran wrote: > What period do you set for collecting new emails? I find > I'm frequently in locations for 2 plus hours where I can't have a > phone but still need to be able to retrieve my email and 2+ hours is > too long to be unable to provide the 2n

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-02 Thread Michael H Moran
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:32 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > Ok.  I've run into a situation where the owner of the domain will > > NOT > > allow the "allow less secure applications" > > option to be used. > > > > Is there any other way to get Evolution to not encounter said > > problem > > from G

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-01 Thread Andre Klapper
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 08:28 -0500, Japhering wrote: > The current default version on LinuxMint vs 18.3, which is Evolution > 3.18.5.2 > > >What are you trying to do? > Create an Imap+ account in Evolution to give me access to a corporate > account where the only official way to access is via

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-01 Thread Pete Biggs
> > If it can't, then your best bet is to use Gnome Online Accounts to > create the account in Evolution. GOA knows about OAuth2 and will deal > with all that side of thing while Evolution will deal with the data > like emails and calendar. > > > > I don't have access to Google Online Accoun

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-01 Thread Japhering
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 15:01 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >    Like what is your version of Evolution? > > The current default version on LinuxMint vs 18.3,  which is > > Evolution > > 3.18.5.2 > I know people get frustrated with us saying this all the time, but > that > is an old

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-01 Thread Pete Biggs
> > > >Like what is your version of Evolution? > > The current default version on LinuxMint vs 18.3, which is Evolution > 3.18.5.2 I know people get frustrated with us saying this all the time, but that is an old version and it doesn't have all the features necessary to deal with evolving

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-01 Thread Japhering
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:32 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > >  > > Ok.  I've run into a situation where the owner of the domain will > > NOT > > allow the "allow less secure applications" > > option to be used. > >  > > Is there any other way to get Evolution to not encounter said > > problem > > from G

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-01 Thread Andre Klapper
Hi, On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 07:08 -0500, Japhering wrote: > Ok. I've run into a situation where the owner of the domain will NOT > allow the "allow less secure applications" > option to be used. > > Is there any other way to get Evolution to not encounter said problem > from Google? Everything I

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-01 Thread Pete Biggs
> Ok. I've run into a situation where the owner of the domain will NOT > allow the "allow less secure applications" > option to be used. > > Is there any other way to get Evolution to not encounter said problem > from Google? Everything I've found so far > suggests that there isn't a alternat

[Evolution] Evolution and Google's less secure app problem

2018-06-01 Thread Japhering
Ok.  I've run into a situation where the owner of the domain will NOT allow the "allow less secure applications" option to be used. Is there any other way to get Evolution to not encounter said problem from Google?   Everything I've found so far suggests that there isn't a alternate solution. Th