-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
OWA on IIS ewww. Unless of course you are lazy.
I could go
Hmmm...neither are good. IMAP w/SSL w/b much better.
OWA on IIS, ewww. Nimda, Code Red, RDS exploits, I could go on. Even
SSL won't save you much.
My .02
- Original Message -
From: WebMeister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001
OWA on IIS ewww. Unless of course you are lazy.
I could go on.
Yes, please go on.
William
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
Hmmm
of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
OWA on IIS ewww. Unless of course you are lazy.
I could go on.
Yes, please go on.
William
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs
They are just different. I like the portability of OWA.
If using IMAP, I would chose IMAP over SSL though (port 993).
And is WebMeister your real name? ;)
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
WebMeister MeisterBurger
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
They are just different. I like the portability of OWA.
If using
m
Portobello Mushrooms...
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
They are just different. I like the portability of OWA
7 matches
Mail list logo