Re: [exim] The most used Exim version is the vulnerable one

Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users (Di 11 Jun 2019 19:58:14 CEST): > The "initial official" date for patch releases was "officially set" by Exim > project / security list onto the 11.06.2019 (today) - so possibly some "less > aware" (LTS) distributors will use that date ("in respect for the project"

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: 4.87 to 4.91 are vulnerable

Hi, Russell King (Di 11 Jun 2019 15:33:47 CEST): > Hi, > > While looking for the fix on the web version of git.exim.org, I find that > although I can get a listing based on the branch, I'm unable to get commit > or commitdiffs. > > For example, the page at: > > https://git.exim.org/exim.git/sho

Re: [exim] Retry configuration

Richard Jones via Exim-users (Fr 07 Jun 2019 15:40:42 CEST): > > 2019-06-06 16:54:12 Received from f...@jonze-test.com U=foobar P=local S=2796 > id=20190606155412.GA27529@junix.systems > 2019-06-06 16:54:12 H=aspmx.l.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c02::1b]: Remote > host closed connection in respon

Re: [exim] short host name in local_domains

Marc Haber via Exim-users (Do 06 Jun 2019 16:07:36 CEST): > Hi, > > in Debian, local_domains gets seeded with "@:localhost" plus whatever > the local administrator has entered to augment the list of > local_domains. Why "localhost"? This would accept messages via SMTP addressed to USER@localhost.

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: 4.87 to 4.91 are vulnerable

Hi, Cyborg via Exim-users (Do 06 Jun 2019 13:24:21 CEST): > As the Advisiory is a bit unspecific for a protection, shouldn't a check > for  "$" in > >   deny    message   = Restricted characters in address >      domains   = +local_domains >          local_parts   = ^[.] : ^

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: 4.87 to 4.91 are vulnerable

The fix for CVE-2019-10149 is public now. https://git.exim.org/exim.git Branch exim-4_91+fixes. Thank you to - Qualys for reporting it. - Jeremy for fixing it. - you for using Exim. Sorry for confusion about the public release. We were forced to react, as details leaked. The

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: 4.87 to 4.91 are vulnerable

We will publish the fix today 2019-06-05 15:15 UTC on the exim-4_91+fixes branch of our public Git repo git.exim.org. Distros can release their packages by that date. Sorry for the inconveniences. -- Heiko Schlittermann (unterwegs) signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ## List details a

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: 4.87 to 4.91 are vulnerable

Hi, our non-public security Git repo is git clone ssh://g...@git.exim.org/exim.git Access is granted to the known and trusted SSH keys we have. The branch fix-CVE-2019-10149 contains the fix. It is one commit ahead of the exim-4_91+fixes branch and we'll eventuelly merge it into the +fixes

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: 4.87 to 4.91 are vulnerable

Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users (Mo 03 Jun 2019 22:29:28 CEST): > t0is expected to be 2019-06-04, 10:00 UTC > t0+7d is expected to be 2019-06-04, 10:00 UTC t0+7d is expected to be 2019-06-11, 10:00 UTC -- Heiko signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ## List details at

[exim] CVE-2019-10149: 4.87 to 4.91 are vulnerable

CVE-2019-10149 Exim 4.87 to 4.91 We received a report of a possible remote exploit. Currently there is no evidenice of an active use of this exploit. A patch exists already, is being tested, and backported to all versions we released since (and including) 4.87.

Re: [exim] unable to send mails to subdomains - dnslookup defer

necktwi via Exim-users (Di 21 Mai 2019 15:41:43 CEST): > setting mx record to > host2.mydomain.com. 300 IN MX 20 host2.mydomain.com. > > instead of > mydomain.com. 300 IN MX 20 host2.mydomain.com. > fixed the issue. It is not plausible. If there is no MX for host2.mydomain.com, the dns looku

Re: [exim] unable to send mails to subdomains - dnslookup defer

necktwi via Exim-users (Mo 20 Mai 2019 11:14:36 CEST): > I just reply all the senders. Now I'm manually sending to the mailing list > alone. Is that all you meant by basic mail etiquette? Please let me know. > Below are the dig queries you've asked Yes. (Many(?) Mail User Agents have an action

Re: [exim] Bounce Handling

MaDhAt2r via Exim-users (Mi 15 Mai 2019 20:49:47 CEST): > My clients want to use different email addresses depending on the > department or who is sending them. i.e. bo...@example.com, t...@example.com. > > They want to keep track of bounces/deliveries. > > What I having trouble with is how do I s

Re: [exim] Retry testing

Charlie Elgholm via Exim-users (Di 07 Mai 2019 16:43:10 CEST): > Hi! > > I have the following retry-line in my Exim version 4.89: > > \N^[^@]+@telia\.\N * H,4d,15m,8 > > When I try it with "exim -brt t...@telia.com" I get this: > Retry rule: \N^[^@]+@telia\.\N * H,4d,15m; If I under

Re: [exim] spool format error: size

exim-users--- via Exim-users (Mo 22 Apr 2019 19:57:42 CEST): … > Exim 4.90.1-1ubuntu1 with sa-exim running on one hosts (Ubuntu standard > config with TLS enabled, sa-exim adding some headers) acting as > smarthost, second Exim generating mail (store some 10+ messages in queue > and trigger deliv

Re: [exim] Shared Hosting + Specific Domain outbound filter

Rafael Wolf via Exim-users (Mo 29 Apr 2019 19:26:59 CEST): > Hi All, > from all domains. > > Example: > > *@customer.com > Subject: encrypt > forward to the Cuda smart host > that will handle encryption based on subject > > *@customer.com > Subject: anything else here > goes out the door from > t

Re: [exim] Server Upgrade

Hi, Rainer Dorsch via Exim-users (Sa 13 Apr 2019 18:15:33 CEST): > I want to upgrade my server from Debian Jessie to Debian Stretch. I am afraid > that at some time during the upgrade process, there is an invalid exim An invalid Exim (or configuration) should not cause messages to get lost. If

Re: [exim] Strange log message: no IP address found for host bazar2, conectiva.com.br

Jeremy Harris via Exim-users (So 31 Mär 2019 20:43:33 CEST): > On 31/03/2019 19:12, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote: > > The log message always refers to the hostname 'bazar2.conectiva.com.br' > > irrespective of the actual host connected? > > > > Has anyone else seen behaviour like this? or have

Re: [exim] A way to fetch retry config from postgres

Hi Nikita, Никита via Exim-users (Mi 13 Mär 2019 15:42:27 CET): > I'm trying to fetch the retry portion of exim4.conf from a postgres > database. > The portion is this default string: * * F,2h,15m; G,16h,1h,1.5; F,14d,6h The specs mention "expansion" for PATTERN

Re: [exim] Exim4 and root aliases? Send a copy to root?

Hany Aziz via Exim-users (So 10 Mär 2019 08:59:05 CET): > Changing the alias in /etc/aliases to > > root: user1, root In theory this would work, in practice it won't with Exim. Exim has a build time "FIXED_NEVER_USERS" list, which in most environments contains "root" and thus it can't be over

Re: [exim] Send mail to specific domains via smart host

Hi Rory, Rory Campbell-Lange via Exim-users (Mi 06 Mär 2019 22:43:00 CET): > no_more > > What I believe I need to add is a block like this: > > dns_yahoo_aol: > debug_print = "R: dnslookup_yahoo_aol for $local_part@$domain" > driver = dnslookup > domains = a

Re: [exim] EXIM Timeout on tcp required ports

Ryan McClung via Exim-users (Di 05 Mär 2019 15:16:16 CET): > Update on this issue. > > I set 465 as the only TLS port. Time out is still occurring on 465. The > openssl client is connecting successfully but testing with an mta testing > tool like swaks times out. > What is the swaks command line

Re: [exim] Header question, X-Relay-User

jan-jun.2019--- via Exim-users (Mo 04 Mär 2019 19:32:53 CET): > > $ exim -bV > > Exim version 4.92 #3 built 11-Feb-2019 21:35:34 > > "Mine" / the version my hoster is running is: > > $ exim --version > Exim version 4.82 #3 built 10-Feb-2018 19:43:33 ohoh, from Exim's perspective this is quite ol

Re: [exim] Header question, X-Relay-User

jan-jun.2019--- via Exim-users (Mo 04 Mär 2019 15:27:31 CET): > > Try > > > > exim -bP config | grep -i x-relay-user > > > > and check, if this header is part of your Exim configuration at all. > > Hi, not clear what you mean by "config", but just > "exim -bP | grep -i relay" > leads to e

Re: [exim] Header question, X-Relay-User

Markus Robert Kessler via Exim-users (Mo 04 Mär 2019 01:04:04 CET): > Hi Heiko, > > > > > When accessing /usr/sbin/exim4 locally, then Squirrel email client is > > > able to write the header without "X-Relay-User" info. But, > > > > So, probably Squirrel isn't the origin of this header. > > > >

Re: [exim] Header question, X-Relay-User

Sorry for the typo. Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users (So 03 Mär 2019 22:45:17 CET): > Hm. This is questionable practice, but probably to the topic we should Hm. This is questionable practice, but probably not the topic we should -- Heiko signature.asc Description: PGP signat

Re: [exim] Header question, X-Relay-User

Hi Markus, jan-jun.2019--- via Exim-users (So 03 Mär 2019 17:10:10 CET): > I want to prevent exim from sending out the "X-Relay-User" header line. In the first place I'd try to find the origin of this line. Exim doesn't know about any such line, the X- prefix indicates, that this isn't a standa

Re: [exim] Spam though my server

Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users (Di 19 Feb 2019 11:20:07 CET): > I am seeing some spam going through my server, but I am not sure what > method is being used by the spammer: > > exim -Mvh 1gw0Ng-0002NF-1H > 1gw0Ng-0002NF-1H-H > mailnull 26 26 > > 1550563436 0 > -received_time_usec .039642 > -

Re: [exim] Running Exim4 in docker - how to set the message_size_limit?

Ralph Soika via Exim-users (Fr 15 Feb 2019 08:43:06 CET): > > Do you think we can build a docker image for exim4 together? For > docker-swarm such an image is a perfect solution to allow services so send > out mails via an gateway. And as I said, I am not really the expert. But I > did not found a

Re: [exim] Exim, NSS, winbind...

Marco Gaiarin via Exim-users (Mi 30 Jan 2019 17:06:55 CET): > > But some weeks ago i've done a general maintenance of my infrastructure, and > i've discovered that exim refuse to deliver to some recipient because users > are not known. > Mail server was temporarly (more then 60 seconds) disconnec

[exim] New release Exim 4.92

Exim 4.92 - About 10 months after the last regular release, we published Exim 4.92 today. You can find it in the following locations: ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/ http://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/ All files are signed with my GPG key, the same key I use to sign this mail. (You m

[exim] New release candidate exim-4.92-RC6 | Feature Freeze

I've just uploaded exim-4.92-RC6 to ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/ http://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/ Please download, build and test. Main change is a fix for "dkim_verify_signers" (Bug 2366). Additionally some small changes to the docs are applied. All files there are signed b

Re: [exim] NFSv4: failed to set ownership on spool file

Phil Pennock via Exim-users (Mi 30 Jan 2019 03:00:25 CET): > On 2019-01-29 at 10:30 +0100, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote: > > - The tcpdump show a V4 SETATTR, but only for the owner (I'd have > > expected the group too), AND the owner is numerical, not user@doma

Re: [exim] NFSv4: failed to set ownership on spool file

Graeme Fowler via Exim-users (Di 29 Jan 2019 11:03:19 CET): > Have you got ‘superuser’ mapping switched on so root maps to UID 0 on the NFS > server? Processes with uid=0 can create and chown files on the share. So I'd say, root_squash is not enabled. > This is referred to as no_root_squash in

[exim] NFSv4: failed to set ownership on spool file

Hi, we run Exim with $spool_directory on a NFSv4 Share. I do not know the gory details of NFSv4 and what operations are expected to work and which operations are expected to break. - UID mapping seems to be enabled (the files have the right owner, if the id-mapping domains on both sides matc

[exim] New release candidate exim-4.92-RC5 | Feature Freeze

I've just uploaded exim-4.92-RC5 to ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/ http://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/ Please download, build and test. Two small bugs are fixed and the docs are updated and clarified in several places. All files there are signed by me, with the same key I use to

Re: [exim] Building exim on Debian Stretch

jpff via Exim-users (Mi 16 Jan 2019 21:03:45 CET): > I am sure I a being obtuse here but I run exim on my firewall computer > which for historical reasons runs Debian. I am in the process of upgrading > to Stretch but I cannot build exim. I rather like to have my own build as > (a) Debian l

Re: [exim] Patch for Exim 4.91 compile warning

Mike Tubby via Exim-users (Mi 16 Jan 2019 14:58:07 CET): > All, > > When compiling Exim 4.91 on Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS I get a gcc warning in the > USR1 signal handler: > > gcc exim.c > exim.c: In function ‘usr1_handler’: > exim.c:242:1: warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’, declared with > attri

[exim] New release candidate exim-4.92-RC4

I've just uploaded exim-4.92-RC4 to ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/ http://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/ Please download, build and test. The main difference to RC3 is a fix that should enable Exim to talk to servers that use TLS 1.3. (Bug 2359) All files there are signed by me, wi

Re: [exim] Exim-4.92-RC3 issues

The Doctor via Exim-users (Mo 24 Dez 2018 20:01:17 CET): > 1) Please defined in DBM where you can add INCLUDES and LIBs > 2) The multiple configuration lines does not seem to work These two questions need more clarification. I'm lost. > 3) I added into my Makefile the local ID for EXim What is

[exim] New release candidate 4.92-RC3

Hi, we need you. I've just packaged a new release candidate exim-4.92-RC3. Please download, build, and test. The only change to RC2 is in the example configuration. So this change may affect packagers that auto-generated theire initial configurations from the example config. The original commen

Re: [exim] [exim-dev] Exim 4.92-RC1

Paul Hecker via Exim-dev (So 16 Dez 2018 19:52:45 CET): > Hi, > for sure, thanks! exim 4.92-RC2 should work for you, doesn't it? -- Heiko signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ #

[exim] New release candidate 4.92-RC2

Hello, a new release candidate has been released: 4.92-RC2 It contains the following fixes since RC1 fa287dc3 Re-create test/configure script aaf3e414 Update Changelog for Bug 2351 569a8b23 Log failures to extract envelope addresses from message headers. Bug 2351 22d6c944 doc:

Re: [exim] Exim 4.92-RC1

Please do not cross-post to lists and private addresses. Paul Hecker (Fr 14 Dez 2018 16:24:43 CET): > can no longer compile this version with my current Makefile as there is > WITH_CONTENT_SCAN=yes > enabled and all other scanner interfaces disabled (as DISABLE_MAL_CLAM=yes, > DISABLE_MAL_AVAST=

Re: [exim] exim-4.92RC1 on Ubuntu 18.04

Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users (So 16 Dez 2018 16:54:51 CET): > Hola! > > It's actually my very first time to manually compile anything on Linux so I > request for help. > I am trying to compile the RC on Ubuntu 18.04.1 and it fails as below, > which I cannot make head or tails on since I am

[exim] Exim 4.92-RC1

I've built and uploaded Exim 4.92-RC1 to https://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test The current ChangeLog (since 4.91) and NewStuff files are attached to this message. The tree is still open for commits. Please check if you've any pending bugfixes or additions. We need you: Please download, b

Re: [exim] problem sending unknown user to another server

Max Franco via Exim-users (Mo 03 Dez 2018 14:38:46 CET): > this is the log for a forwarded mail (i change domain name and mail > addresses): Do not obfuscate please. Help is almost impossible with changed domains if your issue is realated to mail routing. > 2018-12-03 14:31:22 H=mail-wr1-f49.goo

[exim] New release process ahead

Hello, a new release process will start around 2018-12-07, if you have any important bug fixes, or other commits, please speak up. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support -

Re: [exim] headers_add corner case

Ian Zimmerman via Exim-users (Fr 30 Nov 2018 21:24:30 CET): > What happens if the right hand side for headers_add option is empty > after expansion? Clearly I would rather not add an empty header line > ;-) Hm. What is about RFC 5322, is an empty value header line allowed? If yes, I'd expect Ex

Re: [exim] Disclaimer and DKIM

Julian Bradfield via Exim-users (Do 08 Nov 2018 01:22:12 CST): > you don't do it at the outbound MTA, where do you do it? (Unless, of > course you force everybody to use Exchange and absolutely nothing > else...) As I mentioned, I setup Exim *checking* if the disclaimer exists and ask users to c

Re: [exim] Disclaimer and DKIM

Douglas, Daniel via Exim-users (Mi 07 Nov 2018 21:46:38 CST): > We need to add disclaimers to out email and also use DKIM to sign our > messages. Each of these things work individually but if they are both > configured on a transport then the DKIM check fails because the disclaimer is > added

Re: [exim] Problem to Authenticate against two LDAP's

Claudia Koch via Exim-users (Di 30 Okt 2018 13:10:47 CET): > The problem, however, is that there is always an error message: > > Unable to authenticate at present (set_id=x): missing } at end of > condition inside "or" group First I'd repeat the suggestion from Jeremy. 2nd: Can you try to des

Re: [exim] no DMARC?

wido.exim--- via Exim-users (Do 25 Okt 2018 17:30:58 CEST): > > > Hi, > > I am running an Ubuntu 18.04 machine and I am trying to get DMARC > working on my Exim. Therefor I have grabbed the Exim source from Ubuntu > 18.10 and compiled it with this Makefile: > > ===

Re: [exim] Ratelimit database

Juan Bernhard via Exim-users (Mi 05 Sep 2018 13:52:07 CEST): > Hello list, I've recently implemented a ratelimit acl on my servers. I would > like to know how to delete an entry for a specific user in the > /var/spool/exim/db/ratelimit database.  If someone took the time to do a > script, and wan

Re: [exim] Filter with special characters (!?)

Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users (Mo 27 Aug 2018 19:32:32 CEST): > ==> Changing the charset from the configuration file does not work either > ==> I also need to block an issue with the following string: Re: Tu depósito > de $13,710.38 Please attach the raw headers and your configuration snippet

Re: [exim] Block attachment extension

Sławomir Dworaczek via Exim-users (Do 23 Aug 2018 15:47:04 CEST): > this is the whole acl rule > > acl_check_mime: > accept hosts = : > # --- accept messages for abuse / postmaster > accept condition = $acl_m_pm … And the log told you what? -- Heiko signature.asc Description: PG

Re: [exim] Filter with special characters (!?)

Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users (Do 23 Aug 2018 12:48:42 CEST): > Hello, I need to use the following symbols exclamation mark and question mark > (! ?) as characters in a filter but using HEX does not work. > > > discardcondition = ${if match{$header_subject:}{^\277Eres el del > video?\$}}

Re: [exim] Block attachment extension

Sławomir Dworaczek via Exim-users (Do 23 Aug 2018 13:13:45 CEST): > Heloo > how to block attachment with zip rar etc. extension in Exim 4.91 ? > this entry in the configuration has stopped working > > deny condition = ${if match{$mime_boundary}{\N( |\t)$\N}} >message= MIME

Re: [exim] Filter with special characters (!?)

Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users (Mi 22 Aug 2018 20:53:00 CEST): > Hi, I'm trying to create a discard rule for the incoming spam email which > contains an special characters in a subject. > > In the exim log i see this: > > 2018-08-22 07:48:12 1fsQgL-000554-6N Entrantes y Salientes autenticados -

Re: [exim] Moving a queue to another server

Christian K via Exim-users (Do 12 Jul 2018 11:26:27 CEST): > I am wondering if there is a good way to move all pending mails from > one exim server to another. > It is probably not the best idea to move the files from one spool > directory to another (idea 1). Why not? If you stop the Exim insta

Re: [exim] Rspamd-Proxy error with exim

Andrew Lewis via Exim-users (Di 26 Jun 2018 21:50:31 CEST): … > Can we revive Rspamd support please? I expect a non-trivial amount of people > are actively using it. I'm more than happy if we can continue (native) rspamd support. As long as rspamd supports the legacy SpamAssassin-derived protoco

Re: [exim] Rspamd-Proxy error with exim

Hi, Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users (Fr 15 Jun 2018 13:51:19 CEST): > i talk with the rspamd develop, they say this: > > > "In fact, it is Exim who SHOULD drop fucking legacy protocol support. But I > cannot convince its developers to do that. I have fixed this issue at some > point in the p

Re: [exim] Smarthost condition by h_From header variable

Gallai János via Exim-users (Fr 22 Jun 2018 11:36:16 CEST): > Dear Heiko, > > I've tried envelope_sender but Exim says unknow variable. > > The goal is: We would like to use a separate smarthost for specified domains > on real sender ( envelope_sender ) which is in the From: header. The envelo

Re: [exim] callout to Exchange2013

Hi, Fraenzl, Martin via Exim-users (Fr 22 Jun 2018 09:29:50 CEST): > > After finding the example from 2015,I discussed the options with our Exchange > admins. > > When I asked about an example, I talked about the " specialized > router/transport combo" that Heiko mentioned. From my memory

Re: [exim] callout to Exchange2013

Fraenzl, Martin via Exim-users (Do 21 Jun 2018 15:23:26 CEST): > Hi Guys, > > I have an issue with my "verify recipient" acl, where I use a callout to > verify if a user exists or not. > The callout is checking against a Exchange 2013 server farm. > > I found the article below, where Heiko and

Re: [exim] Smarthost condition by h_From header variable

Hi, Gallai János via Exim-users (Do 21 Jun 2018 08:34:39 CEST): > Dear Users, > > I am trying to create a smarthost manualroute route depending on From: > header. Here is my router: > > smarthost: > driver = manualroute > domains = ! +local_domains > condition = ${if eq{${domain:$h_From:

Re: [exim] Temporary reject when random sender verification should succeed

Ian Zimmerman via Exim-users (Do 07 Jun 2018 19:30:34 CEST): > On 2018-06-07 16:44, Jeremy Harris wrote: > > > >> 2018-05-29 12:25:40 H=haskell.org [23.253.242.70]:51176 sender verify > > >> defer for : Could not complete > > >> sender verify callout: mail.haskell.org [23.253.242.70] : > > >> r

Re: [exim] No debug info but stay in foreground, how?

Ian Zimmerman via Exim-users (Fr 08 Jun 2018 07:37:02 CEST): > I need the foreground behavior to run exim under the supervisor daemon, > but I don't care for the verbose debugging output. How can I limit it > to the absolute minimum? I tried -d-all, but then exim again > disconnects into the ba

Re: [exim] spool format error (on some list messages)

exim-users--- via Exim-users (Do 31 Mai 2018 21:52:51 CEST): .. > > >> 1fOL7J-0001BL-DC-H > > … > >> 031 X-Spam-Relay-Country: US US ** > >> 090 Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf tools: Fix perf.data format > >> description of > >> NRCPUS header > >> 065 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 0

Re: [exim] present client certificate on server->server connection

Adrian Zaugg via Exim-users (So 03 Jun 2018 02:16:02 CEST): > > After some testing I found: > > tls_certificate and tls_privatekey in the transport section and in the > main configuration do not behave the same what concerns file access, at > least in 4.84_2: > > In opposition to the transport

Re: [exim] How Does One Stop the Warning: No server cert-- messages?

Martin McCormick via Exim-users (Fr 01 Jun 2018 18:54:05 CEST): > > /var/log/exim4/mainlog has 166 of it's 305 lines occupied with: > > Warning: No server certificate defined; will use a selfsigned one. > Suggested action: either install a certificate or change tls_advertise_hosts > option >

Re: [exim] exim4 Versions above about 4.80 Don't Talk to my ISP's smarthost.

Hi, Martin McCormick via Exim-users (Sa 02 Jun 2018 18:33:41 CEST): > > I even wrote a little shell script that one runs > under sudo > > #!/bin/sh > msg=`mailq |awk '{print $3}'` > if ! test -z $msg;then > exim4 -d -M $msg > fi > > That's because there are two other lines besides the

Re: [exim] present client certificate on server->server connection

Hi, Adrian Zaugg via Exim-users (Fr 01 Jun 2018 02:05:04 CEST): > > I try to set tls_certificate and tls_privatekey in remote smtp transport > in order to instruct exim to present a client certificate on a > connection made to another server. I get an error saying: > > 2018-06-01 00:22:34 1fOVx

Re: [exim] exim4 Versions above about 4.80 Don't Talk to my ISP's smarthost.

Martin McCormick via Exim-users (Do 31 Mai 2018 05:02:35 CEST): > In the first place one can not add protocol=smtps to > /etc/exim4/conf.d/transport/30_exim4-config_remote_smtp_smarthost > as this throws an error now that protocol=smtps is not understood. Try $ exim -bP config and c

Re: [exim] spool format error (on some list messages)

Hi, it looks as if the last SA-Exim header eliminated the blank line that separates header and body. I'm not sure how the sa_exim processing works, I do not use it for long time now. Does it see the original spooled message and modifies it? After this step, Exim does its own processessing, splitt

Re: [exim] Exim4

Анатолій Кондрюк via Exim-users (Mi 30 Mai 2018 09:34:22 CEST): > Help me please. Exim does not send letters with attachments ... there is > nothing in the logs. In the logs, only the successful delivery of a text > message is displayed. Exim should be agnostic with regard of attachments. As lon

Re: [exim] exim4 tls relay to office 365, how to be sure my key/cert are used

Renaud Mertens via Exim-users (Di 29 Mai 2018 11:10:51 CEST): > I'm trying to configure exim4 to relay outgoing mail through office365 > smarthost. > Apparently o365 requires a valid certificate with a known domain in the CN > field, otherwise the amount of mails you can send is limited and you r

Re: [exim] Help with dropping spam e-mail.

Hi Mark, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users (Mo 14 Mai 2018 21:23:46 CEST): > all messages destined to this address. (Ideally this is done > automatically doing inbound recipient verification.) > > A fast (but ugly) solution until you got the right way, could be: > > >

Re: [exim] Help with dropping spam e-mail.

Mark Elkins via Exim-users (Mo 14 Mai 2018 10:23:52 CEST): > > I need help. (pun included) > > Someone is using "ple...@help.co.za" as the source of spam e-mail. The > address does not exist... > delivering 1fI8dS-0008Pd-DC (queue run pid 700) > LOG: MAIN >   ** ple...@help.co.za: Unknown user

Re: [exim] using self=send causes 127.0.0.1 Connection refused

Jeroen van Aart via Exim-users (Sa 12 Mai 2018 01:30:05 CEST): > For about a decade I have been using a configuration which routes email > submitted on port 587 to port 24 on localhost, on which exim is listening as > well. It then will be sent out. First, why don't you send it imediatly, instea

Re: [exim] setting up purchased SSL certificates on existing system

Gary Stainburn via Exim-users (Mo 30 Apr 2018 15:58:52 CEST): > I have now purchased (through 123-reg) a SSL certificate and I am trying to > install it on the server. > > However, copious Google searches all seem to be bringing up the same few > articles, most of which are for specific platfo

Re: [exim] ACL verb "reject" - An error in the Specification?

Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users (Di 17 Apr 2018 21:07:54 CEST): … > I'll fix it, in case it proves to be wrong. > (Until now I do not know of an ACL verb „reject“) spec updated. Thank you for pointing it out. -- Heiko signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ## List detai

Re: [exim] ACL verb "reject" - An error in the Specification?

Mike Brudenell via Exim-users (Di 17 Apr 2018 20:47:32 CEST): > Am I going mad? > > Section 43.36 *Detailed information from merged DNS lists* > > in > the Specification has two examples, such

Re: [exim] Exim 4.91 released

Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users (Mo 16 Apr 2018 11:27:06 CEST): … > gcc -o exim > drtables.o(.text+0xea): In function `init_lookup_list': > : undefined reference to `spf_lookup_module_info' > *** Error code 1 Most likely due to change in the name of the EDITME configuration item from EXPERIME

Re: [exim] Implementing StartTLS, DMarc and DKim on Exim

Peter Hutchison via Exim-users (Mo 09 Apr 2018 15:24:54 CEST): > Has anyone implemented any of the following on their mail systems? StartTLS, > DMarc and DKim. STARTTLS I'd see as a must nowadays. Problems can arise if you have MUAs connecting to your server and your server is presenting a cert

Re: [exim] X-Report-Abuse on mail sent from SMTP PHP

Marco via Exim-users (Sa 31 Mär 2018 08:18:00 CEST): > Under transport configuration of Exim I have added the X-Report-Abuse > header.This works if an email is sent from a mail client but not from an PHP > application > remote_smtp: … > vmail_aliases: … > dnslookup: > also external email rec

Re: [exim] exim filter for incoming mail to be spam

Amjad Qasem via Exim-users (So 25 Mär 2018 16:16:13 CEST): > Dear all, > > I'm try to add Exim filter to make mail as spam , but I don't know > the command or the action to change the Spam static, as below > > if ("$h_from:" contains "x...@gmail.com") >then > spam_score = 100 ??? > end

Re: [exim] Avast and invalid response from scanner

Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users (Mi 14 Mär 2018 15:11:04 CET): > I added /defer_ok to solve this problem, but of course the paniclog will > always receive these errors... I'm not sure, if defer_ok is the right way, except you agree with getting messages with zip bombs (in your case) As it is no

Re: [exim] Avast and invalid response from scanner

Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users (Mi 14 Mär 2018 11:03:19 CET): > Hi list! > > I see very often this message in exim paniclog: > > malware acl condition: avast /var/run/avast/scan.sock : invalid response > from scanner: 'SCAN > /var/spool/exim4/scan/1ew39J-0002Qa-4m/1ew39J-0002Qa-4m-4|>somef

Re: [exim] Antivirus for Linux and Exim

Victor Ustugov via Exim-users (Fr 09 Mär 2018 12:45:42 CET): > Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote on 09.03.2018 12:06: > > Heiko Schlittermann (Fr 09 Mär 2018 11:02:01 CET): > > … > >> Good, then the error message could improved :) Thank you. I'l

Re: [exim] Antivirus for Linux and Exim

Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users (Fr 09 Mär 2018 09:32:32 CET): > Zitat von Mueller via Exim-users : > > Hi Daniel > > > Avast: > > av_scanner = avast:/var/run/avast/scan.sock:FLAGS -fullfiles:SENSITIVITY > > -pup > > av_scanner = avast:your.ip.nr 5036 > > I try now Avast, but I always get the

Re: [exim] Antivirus for Linux and Exim

Heiko Schlittermann (Fr 09 Mär 2018 11:02:01 CET): … > Good, then the error message could improved :) Thank you. I'll check if > we can fix it. Filed a wishlist item (bug#2252) -- Heiko signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim

Re: [exim] Antivirus for Linux and Exim

Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users (Fr 09 Mär 2018 10:25:39 CET): > Zitat von Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users : > > Hello Heiko > > > Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users (Fr 09 Mär 2018 > > 09:32:32 CET): > > > Zitat von Mueller via Exim-users : > >

Re: [exim] Antivirus for Linux and Exim

Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users (Fr 09 Mär 2018 09:32:32 CET): > Zitat von Mueller via Exim-users : > > Hi Daniel > > > Avast: > > av_scanner = avast:/var/run/avast/scan.sock:FLAGS -fullfiles:SENSITIVITY > > -pup > > av_scanner = avast:your.ip.nr 5036 avast:/var/run/avast/scan.sock work

Re: [exim] Integrating ESET Antivirus in Exim

Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users (Do 08 Mär 2018 15:34:56 CET): > Zitat von Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users : > > Hello Heiko, > > > If not supported yet, you can easily sponsor the integration, Lucabert. > I really don't have time to do that... sorry... Ich sp

Re: [exim] Integrating ESET Antivirus in Exim

Hi Lucabert, Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users (Do 08 Mär 2018 12:55:38 CET): > integration with Exim. > We __NEED__ to be able to refuse the E-Mail if infected, so I'd like to scan > the E-Mail in the data_acl. > Unfortunately I didn't found any useful documentation how to do that... :( If not s

Re: [exim] Exim process stack 100% CPU?

Mateusz Krawczyk via Exim-users (Mo 05 Mär 2018 08:32:13 CET): > Hello, > > I'm running latest Centos 6 with exim 4.90.1. Recently I have noticed that > some exim process in my system hangs on phase "handling TLS incoming > connection" using 100% CPU for hours. > > exiwhat > > 41182 handling T

Re: [exim] Before update exim to 4.90, TLS/SSL connection not work

Hi, Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users (Do 22 Feb 2018 18:33:45 CET): > Hello, i update my exim version 4.87 to 4.90, the plain authenticacion work > good, but not SSL or TLS connections. Do we talk about authentication via TLS certificates, or just about TLS connections? I suppose, you're talkin

Re: [exim] exim_dbmbuild in 4.90(.1) requires path to 2nd argument

Frank Richter via Exim-users (Di 20 Feb 2018 08:32:11 CET): > Hi, > > I used to call exim_dbmbuild his way:    exim_dbmbuild /path/to/text-source  > target-file > > Doing so in 4.90.1 leads to: > > exim_dbmbuild: unable to create target-file.dbmbuild_temp: No such file or > directory … > > I

Re: [exim] HostEurope anybody

tech-lists via Exim-users (Sa 17 Feb 2018 16:15:41 CET): > On 16/02/2018 12:34, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote: > > Hi > > > > some you (j*.e@t*.de) responded, but I can't answer: > > > > j*.e*@t*.de > > > > host mail.t*.de [*.*.2

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >