Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Thomas Backlund
From: "Praedor Atrebates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >In the interest of avoiding hard lockups and troubleshooting THAT (see the >lm_sensors thread) when all I want to do is troubleshoot my sound problems, >which lm_sensor module(s) should I load in order to use dmidecode? I would >like to restrict the m

Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In the interest of avoiding hard lockups and troubleshooting THAT (see the lm_sensors thread) when all I want to do is troubleshoot my sound problems, which lm_sensor module(s) should I load in order to use dmidecode? I would like to restrict the m

Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'll send the information you request later today. Unfortunately I am at work and thus not able to access my desktop system. Not the same thing but on a related note, I did run through the troubleshooting process outlined by harddrake (ie, lspci

Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Thomas Backlund
From: "Praedor Atrebates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Your sound system is virtually identical to mine. I have also installed aumix >and maxed out all the sliders. > >All I can say is that when I use 2.4.21 kernels, sound works flawlessly. If I >use anything in the 2.4.22 list, no sound. Sound works in

Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 05:15 pm, Glenn Burkhardt wrote: > >    The sound works just fine. I did have to install > > aumix-2.8-6mdk (it wasn't installed by default) and move all > > it's sliders to 100%, then do the same in kmix. I'm now > > running 10.0, but the sound worked with a 9.2 fresh

Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 11:50 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Your sound system is virtually identical to mine. I have also installed > aumix and maxed out all the sliders. > > All I can say is that when I use 2.4.21 kernels, sound works fla

Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Jack Coates
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 08:50, Praedor Atrebates wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Your sound system is virtually identical to mine. I have also installed aumix > and maxed out all the sliders. > > All I can say is that when I use 2.4.21 kernels, sound works flawlessl

Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heh. APIC is enabled in bios because if I disable it, Mandrake 9.2, no matter what kernel I use, will not bootup. Instead, I get a blank black screen and that's all she wrote. I have tried APIC 1.1 and 1.4 versions or tables (the two options op

Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Glenn Burkhardt
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 05:41 am, Tom Brinkman wrote: > On Wednesday 19 November 2003 02:54 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote: > > At least with regards to sound. > > > > I must now give up on any 9.2 stock kernels. I have now failed > > to get my fully functional sound system to work in 9.2 usi

Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Your sound system is virtually identical to mine. I have also installed aumix and maxed out all the sliders. All I can say is that when I use 2.4.21 kernels, sound works flawlessly. If I use anything in the 2.4.22 list, no sound. Sound works in

Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 02:54 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote: > At least with regards to sound.   > > I must now give up on any 9.2 stock kernels.  I have now failed > to get my fully functional sound system to work in 9.2 using: >  default kernel 2.4.22-10mdk, 2.4.22-21mdk, 2.4.22 multimedia >

Re: [expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Greg Meyer
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 09:54 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote: > Can anyone suggest a way of getting a 9.1 kernel to build/install/function > on a 9.2 install? You should be able to just grab the last 9.1 kernel and install it. -- /g "Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside a d

[expert] I think it's safe to say the 2.4.22 kernel series is screwed

2003-11-19 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At least with regards to sound. I must now give up on any 9.2 stock kernels. I have now failed to get my fully functional sound system to work in 9.2 using: default kernel 2.4.22-10mdk, 2.4.22-21mdk, 2.4.22 multimedia kernel, the 9.2 2.4.22 tmb