Posted to newbie, but got no response.
Since I upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0, I am having problems using my old
(8.1) ~/.xinitrc
If the file even exists, then startx will not work. I don't know what
the cause is, can someone point me in the right direction?
The contents of my old .xinitrc are:
#!/bi
On 20 Nov 2002, Matthew Van Horn wrote:
> Posted to newbie, but got no response.
>
> Since I upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0, I am having problems using my old
> (8.1) ~/.xinitrc
>
> If the file even exists, then startx will not work. I don't know what
> the cause is, can someone point me in the right
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On 20 Nov 2002, Matthew Van Horn wrote:
>
> > Posted to newbie, but got no response.
> >
> > Since I upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0, I am having problems using my old
> > (8.1) ~/.xinitrc
> >
> > If the file even exists, then startx will not work. I don't know what
> > t
Matthew Van Horn wrote:
Posted to newbie, but got no response.
Since I upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0, I am having problems using my old
(8.1) ~/.xinitrc
Since you are going from 8.1 to 9.0, this is a major step (8-->9) and
compatibility may not be assumed.
You need to do an initial install of 9.0
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 09:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 20 Nov 2002, Matthew Van Horn wrote:
> > Since I upgraded from 8.1 to 9.0, I am having problems using my old
> > (8.1) ~/.xinitrc
> >
> > If the file even exists, then startx will not work. I don't know what
> > the cause is, can someone
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 23:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 20 Nov 2002, Matthew Van Horn wrote:
>
> > (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Wed Nov 20 23:15:30 2002
>
> Can you send/post the relevant portions of the above file? The log in
> this email was truncated.
I don't really know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Stodden wrote on Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 03:39:53PM +1100 :
>
> Since you are going from 8.1 to 9.0, this is a major step (8-->9) and
> compatibility may not be assumed.
This is true. The upgrade process is really intended to go from the
previous
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 07:30, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Ron Stodden wrote on Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 03:39:53PM +1100 :
> >
> > Since you are going from 8.1 to 9.0, this is a major step (8-->9) and
> > compatibility may not be assumed.
>
> This is true. The upgrade process is really intended to go from t
