On 01/06/2010 06:50 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 01:27:07PM -0500, Fulko Hew wrote:
>
>>I'd say... only take focus if its a child/creation of the window currently
>>in focus.
>
> You don't want ssh passphrase windows to take focus?
Hell, no! :-)
Andrew.
--
fed
On 01/06/2010 05:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On 1/6/10 11:07 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> PGA.
>>>
>>> Here's the challenge. To reply to this mail, I hit control-shift-r in
>>> one evo window, and evo opened a new window for me to compose i
On 12/23/2009 12:21 AM, Karel Klic wrote:
> Andrew, this problem is already fixed in the latest version; please see
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540921
OK, ta.
Andrew.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedo
I have installed emacs-23.1-10.fc12.src.rpm
Then, when I run
$ rpmbuild -ba emacs.spec
I get
...
+ /usr/bin/make bootstrap
(cd src; /usr/bin/make bootstrap-clean)
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/aph/rpmbuild/BUILD/emacs-23.1/src'
Makefile:103: *** commands commence before first target
Mike A. Harris wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> King InuYasha wrote:
>
>> Except, that could be false advertising. In most cases, where CPU
>> computation is not used heavily, 64-bit is actually SLOWER than the
>> 32-bit counterpart. Optimizations are narrowing the gap
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The absence of a GUI policy editor combined with lack of documentation for
> the config files makes bad defaults a big issue.
This is a key issue. Do I take it that I have to edit the XML files
directly to require authentication for package installs?
So far I have:
$ pk
Seth Vidal wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, nodata wrote:
>
> -sv
>
I do if it's in the default DVD install, or was pulled in in an
upgrade. I've never intentionally installed it, and yes I do. Never
imagined it would be a problem. I'll remove it.
>>> Maybe you and I ha
Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> On 10/26/2009 01:34 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>>> Steve Dickson writes:
>>>
On 10/26/2009 12:06 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, this sounds like "only". Is it out of the question to
>>
Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> On 09/30/2009 06:18 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Steve Dickson wrote:
>>> On 09/30/2009 04:53 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>>> On 09/29/2009 10:10 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
>>>>>> On Tu
Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> On 09/30/2009 04:53 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Steve Dickson wrote:
>>> On 09/29/2009 10:10 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>>>> My main concern is with installer, i
Steve Dickson wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 10:10 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
My main concern is with installer, installing from NFS shares from older
servers, say RHEL5. How will anaconda handle mounting? Will there be
odd errors that
Deji Akingunola wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Joachim
> wrote:
>>> I think there's a valid case for making an exception to this: when a
>>> package is an accelerated version of a particular library. That is,
>>> when the basic functionality of a library is available in a i686
>>> Fed
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Joachim wrote:
>> I do not understand then, that there exist i686 packages which have
>> higher requirements.
>
> Those packages need to be fixed.
>
> I know there are some audio production packages which are building with SSE
> enabled (and required, those packages don't d
Joachim wrote:
>> Quoting Bill Nottingham:
>>
>> Given the loud feedback, I've updated the proposal at:
>>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F12X86Support
>>
>> The revised proposal:
>>
>> - Build all packages for i686 (this requires cmov)
>> - Optimize for Atom
>
> I do not understan
Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:45:19AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> In Ubuntu there's a "Help" button on the top menu bar that leads to a
>> nice help application, yelp. We have that app too, but it doesn't
>> seem to have the same
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> we'd like to announce the 'Fit and Finish' initiative for Fedora,
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fit_and_Finish
>
> with the goal to improve the user experience of the Fedora desktop. We
> want to identify the small (and sometimes large) roadblocks that make
> everyd
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bill Nottingham writes:
>> drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said:
>>> Moving to i686 is fine, non i686 chips are mostly dead (but the
>>> perfomance gain from moving to i686 from i586 is questionable at
>>> best).
>
>> ... how so? It's consistently 1-2% in reasonable benchmarks (rea
Dimi Paun writes:
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> > My guess is your yum is pointed at FC4.
>
> Sorry I didn't mention it, it is indeed. It's just
> broken for FC4 :) People still use it, no?
Well, this is fedora-devel-list.
OK, so you've got a
Dimi Paun writes:
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> > I think you've got yum pointing at jpackage.org, not fedora.
>
> Yes.
>
> > Get rid of whatever yum config you have pointing at jpackage.org, and
> > you'll see this:
>
Dimi Paun writes:
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> > > Heh, 1jpp_2rh > 1jpp, yum should update it, no?
> >
> > No.
>
> Why? Something is broken: my system got into this state
> without me doing anything wrong.
>
> > Yes. Remove it with
Dimi Paun writes:
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> > > [r...@dimi ~]# rpm -q jpackage-utils
> > > jpackage-utils-1.6.6-1jpp
> >
> > You have a bad version of jpackage-utils; remove it and get one from
> > `yum install'. You need version 1jpp_
Dimi Paun writes:
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> > > [r...@dimi ~]# rpm -qf /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers
> > > file /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers is not owned by any package
> >
> > It's in jpackage-utils.
>
> Not here:
Dimi Paun writes:
> This package is giving me grief as well:
>
> [r...@dimi ~]# rpm -e java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp_31rh.FC4.1.i386
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.84077: line 8: /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers: No such
> file or directory
> error: %postun(java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp_3
Stephen J. Smoogen writes:
>
> To be honest, we have found that the following people turn off SeLinux
> for the following reasons:
>
> 1) They were told that xyz would be fixed by turning off SeLinux. In
> most cases, they the problem with xyz was really a config issue that
> they then fix
Horst von Brand writes:
> Philippe Rigault wrote:
>
> > > Due to circumstances outside of our control, we're going to be
> > > unable to keep to the scheduled date of March 15th for the
> > > release of FC5 and instead are going to have to make the
> > > release date Monday, March 20th. Wh
Dax Kelson writes:
> On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 12:34 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > If you choose xen in installation, only kernel-xen-hypervisor is
> > installed, not the ordinary uni/smp kernels on i686.
> > Is this intentional? How could one install both xen and ordinary
> > kernels, without
Pete Zaitcev writes:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:30:35 +, "Garry Harthill"
> wrote:
>
> > 213mb memory and 50% CPU seems a bit excessive.
>
> > Anyone else seeing this?
>
> Nope, mine is at about 53MB with Fedora torrents. It eats a bit of CPU,
> but I run a VIA C3. Heck, ssh eats CP
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:49 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> - should we set an way earlier freezes date for things like anaconda,
> kernel, isolinux, grub and other crucial pieces to make sure they are
> in
> better shape a bit earlier and thus are less likely a reason for
> release
> slips?
If
28 matches
Mail list logo
