On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
If done right, the move to git can still service CVS requests in
some capacity... that may make the transition a little less abrupt
and painful.
Perhaps. But git-cvsserver is a rather limited crutch
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
branches AFAIK. (It's not that awkward, but for developers resisting
change... ah, every changed comma is a slight :-) ... ).
To be clear, I mean developers with better things to do with their
time than dealing
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:57:03PM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Mike Chambers wrote:
If I understand what is happening now (and over the past weekend),
the datacenter machines are moving to a new location, AND the
package building is moving from cvs to git (will be, or already in
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:43:33AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:57:03PM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Mike Chambers wrote:
If I understand what is happening now (and over the past weekend),
the datacenter machines are moving to a new location, AND the
If I understand what is happening now (and over the past weekend), the
datacenter machines are moving to a new location, AND the package
building is moving from cvs to git (will be, or already in process)?
If so, mainly the git move, will we as users/testers/etc notice any
changes - via emails
Mike Chambers wrote:
If I understand what is happening now (and over the past weekend),
the datacenter machines are moving to a new location, AND the
package building is moving from cvs to git (will be, or already in
process)?
Only the former is taking place now. A move from cvs to git is
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote:
If I understand what is happening now (and over the past weekend), the
datacenter machines are moving to a new location, AND the package
building is moving from cvs to git (will be, or already in process)?
The move from CVS
On 12/14/2009 04:57 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Mike Chambers wrote:
If I understand what is happening now (and over the past weekend),
the datacenter machines are moving to a new location, AND the
package building is moving from cvs to git (will be, or already in
process)?
Only the former is
Jeff Garzik wrote:
If done right, the move to git can still service CVS requests in
some capacity... that may make the transition a little less abrupt
and painful.
Perhaps. But git-cvsserver is a rather limited crutch that I can't
imagine anyone wanting to spend much time on, just to let
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 19:55 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
I think of it less as a question of /liking/ CVS, and more an admission
that a global workflow change has real costs for each individual developer.
A flag day-style transition is clean and efficient, but often locks
out developers who
10 matches
Mail list logo
