On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Interestingly with -ggdb it builds fine with out without -O0.
>>>
>>> That makes it a lot more likely to be a compiler flaw (though not
>>> guaranteed).
>>
>> Of course, it turns out this is very likely not a compiler flaw.
>> Compiler au
>>> Interestingly with -ggdb it builds fine with out without -O0.
>>
>> That makes it a lot more likely to be a compiler flaw (though not
>> guaranteed).
>
> Of course, it turns out this is very likely not a compiler flaw.
> Compiler authors everywhere are shocked I'm sure.
>
> See: http://bugzill
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> Interestingly with -ggdb it builds fine with out without -O0.
>
> That makes it a lot more likely to be a compiler flaw (though not guaranteed).
Of course, it turns out this is very l
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:30:50PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>On Thu July 2 2009, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 04:51:50PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> >No I didn't. Are the details published anywhere of how to request access?
>>
>> I'm working on it. Basically, email dwmw2 or me
On Thu July 2 2009, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 04:51:50PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >No I didn't. Are the details published anywhere of how to request access?
>
> I'm working on it. Basically, email dwmw2 or me an ssh public key.
I added this information to the PPC Sig wiki
Peter Robinson wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
Unrelated to this issue, but please use "make V=1" so we see the actual
build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
automake).
With V=1
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1450
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 04:51:50PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
>>> >
>>> > Unrelated to this issue, but please use "make V=1" so we see the actual
>>> > build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
>>> > automa
>> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
>> >
>> > Unrelated to this issue, but please use "make V=1" so we see the actual
>> > build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
>> > automake).
>>
>> With V=1
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
>>>
>>> Unrelated to this issue, but please use "make V=1" so we see the actual
>>> build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
>>> automake).
>>
>> With V=1
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskI
Peter Robinson wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
Unrelated to this issue, but please use "make V=1" so we see the actual
build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
automake).
With V=1
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=145
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 16:28 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
> >
> > Unrelated to this issue, but please use "make V=1" so we see the actual
> > build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
> > automake).
>
> With V=
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
>
> Unrelated to this issue, but please use "make V=1" so we see the actual
> build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
> automake).
With V=1
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1450335&name=build
Peter Robinson wrote:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449113
Unrelated to this issue, but please use "make V=1" so we see the actual
build command lines in the build.log (see the thread about the new
automake).
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-
>> Interestingly with -ggdb it builds fine with out without -O0.
>
> That makes it a lot more likely to be a compiler flaw (though not guaranteed).
>
> Does 'make check' pass in the source tree you built with -O0?
>
> A backtrace would still be great though. Try setting DEBUG=fcatch in
> the envir
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Interestingly with -ggdb it builds fine with out without -O0.
That makes it a lot more likely to be a compiler flaw (though not guaranteed).
Does 'make check' pass in the source tree you built with -O0?
A backtrace would still be great th
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've having some issues with a PPC64 build and was wondering if
>> someone a bit more ppc savy could have a poke.
>
> A backtrace would be really useful here (remember to b
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've having some issues with a PPC64 build and was wondering if
>> someone a bit more ppc savy could have a poke.
>
> A backtrace would be really useful here (remember to b
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've having some issues with a PPC64 build and was wondering if
> someone a bit more ppc savy could have a poke.
A backtrace would be really useful here (remember to build with -ggdb
-O0 for extra usefulness).
The typelib code is
Hi All,
I've having some issues with a PPC64 build and was wondering if
someone a bit more ppc savy could have a poke. It builds fine on x86
and ppc32. git head also has the same issue as the current stable
release so unfortunately that doesn't help much.
PPC64 build
http://koji.fedoraproject.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
