Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103
--- Comment #92 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation)
r...@ocallahan.org 2009-05-05 23:38:29 PDT ---
Please file a new bug for Windows. This patch was fixed as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345
Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345
--- Comment #1 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:21:42 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=342626)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Backspace has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499349
Summary: Backspace has wrong function in Assamese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499349
--- Comment #1 from XinSun xin...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:28:51 EDT ---
The version of pango :
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345
--- Comment #2 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:38:27 EDT ---
the Version-Release number of selected
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398
--- Comment #12 from Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-05-06
06:46:56 EDT ---
I have already tried fc-cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499357
--- Comment #1 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:45:51 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=342628)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398
--- Comment #11 from Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-05-06
06:46:00 EDT ---
Created an attachment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499357
Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499360
Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358
Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #37 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 20:07:02
EDT ---
pa-in is fine. I'll think about this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #38 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 20:29:13
EDT ---
So pa_IN.orth should be renamed to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #39 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 20:35:34
EDT ---
No. Either Qt patched to use pa-in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #40 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-06 20:43:28
EDT ---
Maybe renaming it back in fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345
--- Comment #3 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 21:55:37 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=342755)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #41 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-06 21:59:37
EDT ---
FYI, Qt 3 appears not affected, no
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #42 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 23:27:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #39)
No. Either Qt patched
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #43 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 23:34:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #42)
(In reply to comment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #44 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 00:04:13
EDT ---
Patched qt here (4.5.0-15.fc11):
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #47 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 00:23:37
EDT ---
I submitted a qt-4.5.1-3.fc11.1 build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #48 from A S Alam aa...@redhat.com 2009-05-07 00:54:45 EDT ---
Bug fixed with 4.5.0-15.fc11 package.
Thanks
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #49 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 01:22:34
EDT ---
Tag request for qt-4.5.0-15.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #50 from A S Alam aa...@redhat.com 2009-05-07 01:29:59 EDT ---
fontconfig (which is build by than) need to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
--- Comment #52 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 01:47:27
EDT ---
Re comment #50: I'm not sure I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
31 matches
Mail list logo