Hi
We maintain some amount of user stats at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Statistics but another important metric
that is useful for monitoring project growth level is amount of
contributors and contributions they have made.
We could keep publish a page that has number of contributors involv
I'm moving our production nagios install onto its own machine with cacti
(noc1) We've had a few false positives because lockbox is just too busy
with other things. In the process of this move I was wondering how we
should do nagios notifications. I see two options:
1) Create a nagios group
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance. What do you
guys think?
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 09:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
> Infrastructure are r
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
> Infrastructur
On Monday 02 July 2007 9:13:10 am Mike McGrath wrote:
> starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
> Infrastructure are reall
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 09:19 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 9:13:10 am Mike McGrath wrote:
> > starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> > with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> > people on this list as to a prefe
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 09:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> git:
+1
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
> Infrastructur
On 07/02/2007 04:13 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
> Infrastructure are really pretty s
Oliver Falk wrote:
On 07/02/2007 04:13 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
Infrastructure ar
Mike McGrath wrote:
Actually this SCM is just for our infrastructure stuff (not the
packages) so it replaces what is now in:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/?root=fedora
Wouldn't it be better to make the decision for both together and settle
down on one SCM instead?
Rahul
_
On 07/02/2007 04:37 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Oliver Falk wrote:
>> On 07/02/2007 04:13 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>>
>>> starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
>>> with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
>>> people on this list as to a p
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Actually this SCM is just for our infrastructure stuff (not the
packages) so it replaces what is now in:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/?root=fedora
Wouldn't it be better to make the decision for both together and
settle down on one SCM inst
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:19:43AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 9:13:10 am Mike McGrath wrote:
> > starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> > with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> > people on this list as to
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:10:17PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> >
> >Actually this SCM is just for our infrastructure stuff (not the
> >packages) so it replaces what is now in:
> >http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/?root=fedora
>
> Wouldn't it be better to make the d
The db1 upgrade is going to happen soon. I'd like to do it next monday
(one week from today). I'll be scheduling an outage for Monday night.
I'd like for everyone who can be around, to be around at that time.
Also keep a special eye out the next day for any oddities. The basic
premise is t
On Monday 02 July 2007 10:50:39 Axel Thimm wrote:
> +1. There's also better intergration with other tools like trac, and
> it's written in Fedora's favourite script language, so when something
> comes up we'd be able to attack it instead of submitting feature
> requests.
The Trac integration is on
On Monday 02 July 2007 10:13:10 Mike McGrath wrote:
> git:
Git. Sane in-repo branching, which we may want to do for having different
tools for different platforms (RHEL5 vs "Latest Fedora"). Easier to host a
clone if somebody wants to share a patch with us. FWIW consistency with the
release
> Any questions?
Any reason not to use MySQL replication instead of doing the dump
between boxes (I don't know Postgres, but I assume it has something
similar)?
Just wanting the resources to be dedicated to each DB platform or use
it more as a backup instead of a hot failover?
Just curious... n
The problem with the bugzilla script syncing should now be fixed.
Bugzilla was changed on Friday night to user all lowercase email
addresses rather than mixed case. The direct db access used by our sync
scripts was by-passing the normalization. I've fixed up the script so
things should be better
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Any questions?
Any reason not to use MySQL replication instead of doing the dump
between boxes (I don't know Postgres, but I assume it has something
similar)?
Just wanting the resources to be dedicated to each DB platform or use
it more as a backup instead of a hot
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left with
> either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the people on
> this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
> Infrastructur
Same as me, any is good.
As Seth git is alphabetically first so +1 git
On 7/2/07, Luke Macken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with
> either git or mercurial. Can I
On 7/2/07, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
Infrastructure are really pretty
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:24:39AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 10:50:39 Axel Thimm wrote:
> > +1. There's also better intergration with other tools like trac,
> > and it's written in Fedora's favourite script language, so when
> > something comes up we'd be able to attack i
On Monday 02 July 2007 14:16:49 Axel Thimm wrote:
> In the trac camp there's love for mercurial but not for git, don't ask
> me why. Also when 0.10 hit the streets mercurial support for it was
> working and managable, while git was in "experimental planning stage".
>
> But don't rust me, just look
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 08:38 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > Any questions?
>
> Any reason not to use MySQL replication instead of doing the dump
> between boxes (I don't know Postgres, but I assume it has something
> similar)?
>
> Just wanting the resources to be dedicated to each DB platform o
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'm moving our production nagios install onto its own machine with cacti
> (noc1) We've had a few false positives because lockbox is just too busy
> with other things. In the process of this move I was wondering how we
> should do nagios notifications
I would like to remind everyone to vote in the Fedora Board elections,
which are currently ongoing. If you are getting this message multiple
times, I'm sorry. It's being sent to various lists.
The Fedora Board's membership changes on a rotating basis. This
election is for 3 of the 9 Fedora
Mike McGrath wrote:
> starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
> Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
> Infrastructur
32 matches
Mail list logo
