+1 from me :)
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 20:54 -0500, Ian Weller wrote:
> (cc docs)
>
> Request to change https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Common.css to
> the following:
>
> =
> .messagebox.wikicleanup {
> background-image: url("/w/uploads/7/72/Wiki-cleanup-background.png");
>
Do we want to turn this page static for the Alpha release?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Alpha/ReleaseNotes
I put out the last call for changes and am making a few myself. Is
there a good target for calling to static for now?
We'll want to make sure we can edit it. Perhaps as part
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 09:29 -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> On 2008-06-09 04:03:46 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> > So, based on the argumentation above, my proposal is to trust the users and
> > remove the "nofollow" attribute.
> Heh, I don't think we even knew about this being on by default :-). I
> jus
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 11:18 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> It was explained in multiple emails that people shouldn't even bother
> reporting this stuff, just fix it.
I responded to the user directly, and turned that in to this:
http://iquaid.org/2008/06/12/wiki-update-lost-content-and-l10n/
This
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 16:27 +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> 2008/6/10 Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'd like to propose another wiki URL structure change.
> >
> > In the past years, with the previous wiki, there was a drive to build deeply
> > nested page hierarchies. For example Foo SIG
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 10:28 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> > > Alternatively, perhaps we should just have an GSoC group? These gu
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Alternatively, perhaps we should just have an GSoC group? These guys
> are
> technically contributors...
I didn't realize this discussion was cross-posted, I already sent my
agreement to this idea to the other thread. Having a group 'gso
Just doing some thinking ...
If we want to move our OpenID acceptance outside of Fedora's OpenID
server, we'll have a blocker with the CLA. AIUI, we need someone to
knowingly accept the CLA and have that tied to a Real Name and email
address in our database. Right?
However, OpenID could be a go
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 12:44 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 19:20 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>
> > Add here probably a "language" for when/if we will have language based
> > sub-planets. It is possible to have multiple values, like
> > language = english, french
> > for the case
