Hi,
For a few days false notification of nagios reduced. But it has increased again.
Looking at the /configs/system/nagios/services/template.cfg reveals
that it is configured as
max_check_attempt = 4 and retry_check_interval 1 for hosts
and
max_check_attempts = 3 and retry_check_interval 1.
S
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> For a few days false notification of nagios reduced. But it has increased
> again.
You sure?
>
> Looking at the /configs/system/nagios/services/template.cfg reveals
> that it is configured as
> max_check_attempt = 4 and retry_check_interval 1 for hosts
> and
> max_check_attempts = 3
> > So if a service or host is unreachable for 3 or 4 mins, we get a
> > notification. (However most of the cases it is false positive, due to
> > congestion or others).
> Looking through my email, from what I can recall there are no false
> positives. xen6 had to be power-cycled which caused
>> > So if a service or host is unreachable for 3 or 4 mins, we get a
>> > notification. (However most of the cases it is false positive, due to
>> > congestion or others).
>> Looking through my email, from what I can recall there are no false
>> positives. xen6 had to be power-cycled which c
Nigel Jones wrote:
Looking through my email, from what I can recall there are no false
positives. xen6 had to be power-cycled which caused all the other
collateral notifications.
Collateral notifications can be caught using service dependencies and
parent hosts. Do we currently use any?
Ki
On Sun, April 27, 2008 11:01 pm, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Nigel Jones wrote:
>> Looking through my email, from what I can recall there are no false
>> positives. xen6 had to be power-cycled which caused all the other
>> collateral notifications.
>>
>
> Collateral notifications can be caught usi
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
> > > So if a service or host is unreachable for 3 or 4 mins, we get a
> > > notification. (However most of the cases it is false positive, due to
> > > congestion or others).
> > Looking through my email, from what I can recall there are no fals
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Nigel Jones wrote:
> > Looking through my email, from what I can recall there are no false
> > positives. xen6 had to be power-cycled which caused all the other
> > collateral notifications.
> >
>
> Collateral notifications can be caught using serv
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Nigel Jones wrote:
> On Sun, April 27, 2008 11:01 pm, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> > Nigel Jones wrote:
> >> Looking through my email, from what I can recall there are no false
> >> positives. xen6 had to be power-cycled which caused all the other
> >> collateral notifications
