On 12/31/2009 12:11 PM, David Dembrow wrote:
Attempting to install fedora 12, I get a message that there is not
enough memory to install in graphic mode and it reverts to a text mode
and installs some prepackaged set of applications. It is a system
with 384 megabytes of memory and the graphic
Donald Russell wrote:
Another system uses FTP to drop files in a directory for me to process.
I have a bash script to process the incoming files. The script is
started by cron periodically.
There's a problem if the FTP transfer is still in progress because the
process begins reading the file
paul van der meij wrote:
I upgraded from FC9 to FC11 (new install) but iptables is behaving
strange. My /etc/sysconfig/iptables file shows a number of ports as
accept, but nmap tells a different story. e.g. imap port 143 is closed
in nmap (and in truce), open in iptables file.
I did use the ip
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to upgrade my F10 system to F11 (fresh install), but F11's
anaconda wouldn't detect my md RAID sets. I booted back into F10 and
after a bit of investigation, I discovered fdisk can't even read the
partition table of my 3 drive RAID 5 set. But, a look a
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
On 09/23/2009 01:35 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
'/test1: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `{
Starting the script with
#!/bin/bash
might be a good idea.
I used vi to insert this line and I get:
./test1
-bash: ./test1: /bin/bash^M: bad
gil...@altern.org wrote:
Sometimes OpenOffice reminds me of the bad old days of WordPerfect.
Everything is so complicated, even though the document formatting I need
is just elementary.
For now, all I want to do is set automatic page numbering in the x/y
format, e.g.: 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, etc., for ev
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have been using an rsync for Centos updates like:
rsync -auv rsync://mirrors/updates/i386/ --delete --exclude=debug/
/repos/centos/updates/i386
But for Fedora 11, I see there is a drpms subdirectory that I ASSuME I
don't need, drpms.
How do I exclude two subd
Bob Goodwin wrote:
I just had perhaps the third occurrence of this problem.
I tried to shut down gthumb which was displaying a a photo from the
nfs server. It would not shut down, at least not in a reasonable
amount if time. Gkrellm showed cup1 running at max. and top indicated
the cup at 99.
Mike Adolf wrote:
Could the problem be
due to the ntfs file system on the shared folder? If I change it to ext
how does windows use it?
Mike
How does which windows use it? If the ntfs partition is solely mounted
by your Linux OS, and shared with Windows on other boxes via Samba, then
the shar
David wrote:
On 6/5/2009 5:22 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 05:06:36PM -0400, David wrote:
On 6/5/2009 4:25 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Hello list,
All software has bugs. Some are known, and some are un
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009 14:12:42 -0400
Christopher K. Johnson wrote:
The stored key issue was symptomatic of the problem resolving host to ip
address incorrectly.
There is a command who's name I forget for printing the arp tables,
so you can find out what mac ad
Geoffrey Leach wrote:
Two systems A and B, connected via wireless. A and B both have the same
/etc/hosts. Connecting from B to A, "ssh A", works fine. However on A,
"ssh B" logs me into A. This used to work fine; the only clue I have is
that ssh did not like the stored RSA key. I let it fix it,
Jack Howarth wrote:
Is anyone else still having the stock ati drivers in Fedora
10 occasionally blank out the screen? I have been resorting to
the use of the nomodeset kernel argument in an attempt to disable
modesetting, but, while less frequent, the black screens still
appear. Normally, it w
Jack Lauman wrote:
Yes, I need to add root back in...
Not necessarily.
You would be safer to boot rescue from an installer DVD, then choose to
mount the filesystems for your compromised F9. Shutdown each system,
move it to a trusted network, or off-net and attach an external disk to
save fi
Jameson wrote:
Ok, now, I've set up a reverse zone containing just the two entries
for the 192.168.1.55 client and my server at 192.168.1.51. Forward
look ups work fine. host 192.168.1.55 gives me: Host
55.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Well, I fixed this.. I accidental
Jameson wrote:
All of my NFS exports suddenly stopped working last night after
updating my F10 server. The only thing I can think of that has
changed has been the updates. In messages, I'm getting:
mountd Warning: Client IP address '192.168.1.55' not found in host lookup
mountd: connect from 19
Kam Leo wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Beartooth wrote:
Today I decided to tackle my main machine. Anaconda launches --
but before it starts asking about language, keyboard, etc, I get the
dread "signal out of range; set to 1680x1050". But it has never ever yet
let me get to
Use iptstate to see current iptables connection table entries.
yum install iptstate # if not already installed.
Chris
--
"A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know
they shall never sit in" - Greek Proverb
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To uns
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 13:34:06 -0800,
"Daniel B. Thurman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to have a single DNS server support
two different domain names, with each domain
name having it's own forward and reverse lookups?
It is possible for PTR looku
Eric Penrose wrote:
I find it confusing that the settings on fedora 9 live for firewall
are such that we tick the options that we trust such as secure http or
http. If firewall is on anyway, what is the implication of setting
these internet options to trust as opposed to leaving firewall on, b
Tim wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 07:46 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [1:233]
If you send me off-list the iptables file you want as an attachment, I
will send you back notes and a corrected file.
Clearly there is some simple mis-communication or editing going on
because this is a basic iptables configuration.
Chris
--
"A society grows great when old men plant trees
It appears from your email that there was an editing error at the COMMIT
or line after.
Perhaps instead of a line-end on those lines it has spaces and wrapped
them into one long line?
Could happen from copy and paste depending on circumstances.
Check that each rule is on its own line.
Antonio O
I would add the *nat through COMMIT before the existing *filter line.
I don't believe it matters as long as you do not mix them together. But
usually the *nat is much briefer than *filter, thus a good convention to
put it first to find easily later.
Antonio Olivares wrote:
It seems that it
Does /etc/sysconfig/iptables actually contain the lines
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [1:233]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
No snat rule in effect!
Was the rule you provided in your original post verbatim? Because it
had 'a' instead of the public address. In fact the rule seemed overly
specific in other ways too.
Here is what I have for a snat rule where the public (Internet)
interface is eth1 (substitute your pu
What does this command produce? (shows whether your snat rule is
implemented correctly)
iptables -vnL -t nat
And this one? (tells if ip forwarding is on)
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
Chris
--
"A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know
they shall never sit in
Beartooth wrote:
I'd like to pipe that into top, or some such, to make it display
only the files of 100K and up; but trying to read the man page for top,
as usual for powerful commands, makes me think of standing at the foot of
a huge cliff of ice
How about looking at the largest 30 files and
I don't know if this is a silly suggestion, because I don't know your
physical setup.
Any chance that the beeping is actually from an adjacent UPS instead?
Some provide similar indications when tested and there is an issue such
as weak batteries, and your software for the UPS could be initiat
Gijs wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Gijs writes:
Hey List,
Not sure why this is happening so perhaps someone can explain this
to me.
Whenever I update bind it messes up/resets access rights on my zone
files. Now normally this wouldn't be a bad thing, but because I have
dynamic updates on, f
Rick Bilonick wrote:
This works fine. The only problem is the connection always times out
even though I've changed the sshd_config files on both machines to keep
it alive. I've restarted the sshd daemon also. Not sure why the
connection keeps closing.
Some firewalls have a time limit on connec
jrw wrote:
Sander Hoentjen wrote:
Hi list,
For the first time in my life i tried to install Fedora with sw raid.
See below what went wrong.
Here is what I did:
Start with 2 empty 500GB sata disks.
Make sure nvraid is turned off in my BIOS.
Start an F9 install, creating 2 sw RAID partitions: md
dave giurintano wrote:
My former computer died. I had a dual boot XP and FC4 setup. I bought
a new machine vista and figured to get my /home, all I'd need to do
was boot form a FC9 live CD and move it ot my external hard drive. But
all I see is the /boot partition on the old linux drive. I t
33 matches
Mail list logo
