Re: Selinux, Fail2ban, iptables BUG

2009-05-23 Thread Jonathan Underwood
2009/5/23 Jim : > FC10/KDE > > Has anyone run across this problem run across this while running >  fail2ban-0.8.3-18.fc10.noarch  ?? > > there are two Redhat bug reports on this same problem and they seem to think > it's fixed, but it isn't. > Bug # > 499674 > 491444 > This is a design problem wit

Re: Selinux, Fail2ban, iptables BUG

2009-05-23 Thread Frank Murphy (Frankly3d)
Jim wrote: FC10/KDE Has anyone run across this problem run across this while running fail2ban-0.8.3-18.fc10.noarch ?? there are two Redhat bug reports on this same problem and they seem to think it's fixed, but it isn't. Bug # 499674 491444 Hi Jim, Glad you done a bugzilla. But joinin

Re: Selinux, Fail2ban, iptables BUG

2009-05-23 Thread Antti J. Huhtala
la, 2009-05-23 kello 12:14 -0400, Jim kirjoitti: > FC10/KDE > > Has anyone run across this problem run across this while running > fail2ban-0.8.3-18.fc10.noarch ?? > > there are two Redhat bug reports on this same problem and they seem to > think it's fixed, but it isn't. > Bug # > 499674 > 4

Selinux, Fail2ban, iptables BUG

2009-05-23 Thread Jim
FC10/KDE Has anyone run across this problem run across this while running fail2ban-0.8.3-18.fc10.noarch ?? there are two Redhat bug reports on this same problem and they seem to think it's fixed, but it isn't. Bug # 499674 491444 Summary: SELinux is preventing iptables (iptables_t) "read